Step into the world of The Stepford Wives
August 20, 2004 | 12:00am
This brand new version of The Stepford Wives, a remake based on the 1975 cult classic, which itself is based on the horror novel by Rosemarys Baby author Ira Levin, has Nicole Kidman in her first comedy role in a while; after all those dramas (The Hours, The Human Stain, Cold Mountain, Dogville), all of them excellent films nonetheless, its nice to see her flex that comic muscle, especially with the upcoming Bewitched movie.
In The Stepford Wives, Kidman plays Joanna, an idealistic TV executive-slash-staunch feminist whose new season lineup features man-bashing reality shows that one could hardly call subdued. But when one of her controversial shows gets her into trouble with the network, shes fired. Depressed and miserable, Joanna, with her husband Walter (Matthew Broderick), moves the family from the chaotic anxiety of the city to the picture-perfect bucolic town of Stepford, Connecticut or is it too perfect? The town seems so ideal, so happy, so cheerful, so joyful, so perfect, that its too much for a true-blue New Yorker to handle. With the two other black sheep of the town, Roger (Roger Bart) and Bobbie (Bette Midler), Joanna looks for the secret this seemingly flawless town is hiding, and they find it: The men of Stepford, headed by Mike Wellington (Christopher Walken), whos married to Claire (Glenn Close), have been turning their wives into robots, programmed slaves that wait on them hand and foot, even as Bobbie shockingly points out providing enormous orgasms at the middle of the day. Together, the three have to find a way to escape before they themselves become robots.
Director Frank Oz does one thing different with his new version of Stepford: Instead of setting the films tone as a horror movie, he ups the comic aspect of the screenplay. This decision couldve proven to be fatal for the remake, though Oz, with screenwriter Paul Rudnick, is able to pull this off: the hilarious script of dark-comic satire and zippy one-liners successfully infuses and melds the scraps of the 70s feminism movement that appeared in the novel with the modern-day sensibilities of 2004.
But the cast is what I love the most about The Stepford Wives: Nicole Kidman, Bette Midler, Christopher Walken, Glenn Close, Matthew Broderick, (big screen debut alert!) Faith Hill what more could you want? Their performances, like Stepfords façade, are perfect: Kidman and Midler are hilarious as the antisocial Joanna and bohemian scatterbrain Bobbie, respectively. But its Glenn Close, Faith Hill and the other oh-so-perfect women of Stepford that provide the films true delight; their Stepfordized selves are funny and freaky at the same time that when you laugh (and you laugh a lot), youre not sure whether youre laughing because you think its funny or because youre afraid to actually be scared.
Bottom Line: The Stepford Wives is a fresh, fun, hilarious feminist satire with an irresistible cast.
Grade: B+
Freddy vs. Jason? Thats so last year. The next battle royale between two movie monsters is Alien vs. Predator, which tries to replicate the success of the former, which was a fun, campy, but dumb romp of horror-geek fantasies; however, AVP is nothing but dumb.
Theres barely a plot in AVP, so I dont know why Id bother trying to explain it. But for the desperately curious, here I go: After an ancient pyramid is found in Antarctica, an old, rich guy (Lance Henriksen) with disposable cash hires a team of bland, two-dimensional characters to excavate the site; among them are Alexa Woods (Sanaa Lathan), an environmental guide, and Sebastian de Rosa (Raoul Bova), an archaeologist. However, once they arrive at the pyramid, they realize that theyre caught in the middle of a war between the two sci-fi movie alien species: the Aliens from the Alien quadrilogy and the Predators from the two films starring the Governator. And as always, as the body count rises, they must find a way to escape before theyre killed blah, blah, blah.
Okay, so you already may have noticed that I dont like this movie very much, and there are plenty of reasons why. Lets begin with the screenplay, or rather, the lack of it: writer-director Paul W.S. Andersons skeleton of a script is just a sorry, pathetic excuse to get the two monsters together, and is filled with some of the most shockingly bad dialogue weve seen all year; at one point, some guy with a gun (frankly, the movie was so boring I didnt even bother to remember his name) oh-so-eloquently shouts, "You ugly, son of a bitch!" to an alien. Now thats a quote to remember, one that stands alongside, "Frankly, my dear, I dont give a damn." Also, half the time, with all the bullets, slime, and blood flying past you, you dont even know whats happening, and you dont even bother to know.
Anderson is so caught up with all the visual effects and action that he doesnt care if his screenplay is a mess, if the story propels to absurdity, and if his actors give terrible performances. Words arent enough to describe the extreme dreadfulness of Alien vs. Predator: bad, terrible, awful, stupid, silly, dumb, ridiculous, painful, excruciating, torturous, horrendous, agonizing, pathetic, even headache-inducing; they just dont do the trick. AVP isnt just the hands-down worst film so far of 2004, its cinema at its lowest, most unpleasant form.
Bottom Line: Alien vs. Predators tagline goes, "Whoever wins we lose." Theyre right: We lose 90 minutes of our time, we lose our faith in cinema, and we lose the will to live.
Grade: F
Movies
Watch The Stepford Wives.
Definitely avoid even thinking about watching Alien vs. Predator. If you are, however, forced to see it, dont forget the Extra Strength Tylenol.
For comments, e-mail me at lanz_gryffindor@yahoo.com.
In The Stepford Wives, Kidman plays Joanna, an idealistic TV executive-slash-staunch feminist whose new season lineup features man-bashing reality shows that one could hardly call subdued. But when one of her controversial shows gets her into trouble with the network, shes fired. Depressed and miserable, Joanna, with her husband Walter (Matthew Broderick), moves the family from the chaotic anxiety of the city to the picture-perfect bucolic town of Stepford, Connecticut or is it too perfect? The town seems so ideal, so happy, so cheerful, so joyful, so perfect, that its too much for a true-blue New Yorker to handle. With the two other black sheep of the town, Roger (Roger Bart) and Bobbie (Bette Midler), Joanna looks for the secret this seemingly flawless town is hiding, and they find it: The men of Stepford, headed by Mike Wellington (Christopher Walken), whos married to Claire (Glenn Close), have been turning their wives into robots, programmed slaves that wait on them hand and foot, even as Bobbie shockingly points out providing enormous orgasms at the middle of the day. Together, the three have to find a way to escape before they themselves become robots.
Director Frank Oz does one thing different with his new version of Stepford: Instead of setting the films tone as a horror movie, he ups the comic aspect of the screenplay. This decision couldve proven to be fatal for the remake, though Oz, with screenwriter Paul Rudnick, is able to pull this off: the hilarious script of dark-comic satire and zippy one-liners successfully infuses and melds the scraps of the 70s feminism movement that appeared in the novel with the modern-day sensibilities of 2004.
But the cast is what I love the most about The Stepford Wives: Nicole Kidman, Bette Midler, Christopher Walken, Glenn Close, Matthew Broderick, (big screen debut alert!) Faith Hill what more could you want? Their performances, like Stepfords façade, are perfect: Kidman and Midler are hilarious as the antisocial Joanna and bohemian scatterbrain Bobbie, respectively. But its Glenn Close, Faith Hill and the other oh-so-perfect women of Stepford that provide the films true delight; their Stepfordized selves are funny and freaky at the same time that when you laugh (and you laugh a lot), youre not sure whether youre laughing because you think its funny or because youre afraid to actually be scared.
Bottom Line: The Stepford Wives is a fresh, fun, hilarious feminist satire with an irresistible cast.
Grade: B+
Freddy vs. Jason? Thats so last year. The next battle royale between two movie monsters is Alien vs. Predator, which tries to replicate the success of the former, which was a fun, campy, but dumb romp of horror-geek fantasies; however, AVP is nothing but dumb.
Theres barely a plot in AVP, so I dont know why Id bother trying to explain it. But for the desperately curious, here I go: After an ancient pyramid is found in Antarctica, an old, rich guy (Lance Henriksen) with disposable cash hires a team of bland, two-dimensional characters to excavate the site; among them are Alexa Woods (Sanaa Lathan), an environmental guide, and Sebastian de Rosa (Raoul Bova), an archaeologist. However, once they arrive at the pyramid, they realize that theyre caught in the middle of a war between the two sci-fi movie alien species: the Aliens from the Alien quadrilogy and the Predators from the two films starring the Governator. And as always, as the body count rises, they must find a way to escape before theyre killed blah, blah, blah.
Okay, so you already may have noticed that I dont like this movie very much, and there are plenty of reasons why. Lets begin with the screenplay, or rather, the lack of it: writer-director Paul W.S. Andersons skeleton of a script is just a sorry, pathetic excuse to get the two monsters together, and is filled with some of the most shockingly bad dialogue weve seen all year; at one point, some guy with a gun (frankly, the movie was so boring I didnt even bother to remember his name) oh-so-eloquently shouts, "You ugly, son of a bitch!" to an alien. Now thats a quote to remember, one that stands alongside, "Frankly, my dear, I dont give a damn." Also, half the time, with all the bullets, slime, and blood flying past you, you dont even know whats happening, and you dont even bother to know.
Anderson is so caught up with all the visual effects and action that he doesnt care if his screenplay is a mess, if the story propels to absurdity, and if his actors give terrible performances. Words arent enough to describe the extreme dreadfulness of Alien vs. Predator: bad, terrible, awful, stupid, silly, dumb, ridiculous, painful, excruciating, torturous, horrendous, agonizing, pathetic, even headache-inducing; they just dont do the trick. AVP isnt just the hands-down worst film so far of 2004, its cinema at its lowest, most unpleasant form.
Bottom Line: Alien vs. Predators tagline goes, "Whoever wins we lose." Theyre right: We lose 90 minutes of our time, we lose our faith in cinema, and we lose the will to live.
Grade: F
Watch The Stepford Wives.
Definitely avoid even thinking about watching Alien vs. Predator. If you are, however, forced to see it, dont forget the Extra Strength Tylenol.
BrandSpace Articles
<
>