^

Opinion

Lifetime ban for filing ‘frivolous’ asylum claim

IMMIGRATION CORNER - Michael J. Gurfinkel - The Philippine Star

Recently, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the deportation/removal of a person who had filed a “frivolous” asylum claim, in which the person had stated that he was persecuted in his home country, which turned out to be untrue. Now, even though his US citizen wife tried to petition him, he was banned for life because of that old asylum claim, which came back to “haunt” him.

In that particular case, the person came to the US in 2000, and eventually went out of status (TNT). In 2006, he filed an asylum application, in which he stated that he had first entered the US in 2005. (He gave an incorrect date of entry in order to beat the one‑year deadline for filing an asylum application). He further swore that he had been attacked in his home country, suffered broken ribs and collarbone, and had two of his teeth knocked out. Eventually, he was called in for an interview on his asylum claim and swore, under oath, that he had been persecuted and the story in his asylum application was true. The asylum claim was denied and he was placed in removal proceedings.

At his removal proceeding, he withdrew his asylum application and admitted that he had not really been persecuted. Despite being under petition by his US citizen wife, he was ordered removed, because under immigration law a person “shall be permanently ineligible for any benefits under [the Immigration and Nationality Act],” if they had “knowingly made a frivolous application for asylum.”

In this case, the immigration judge concluded that this person had made numerous misrepresentations. For example although he entered the US in 2000, he claimed to have entered the US in 2005, in order to fool the USCIS that he had met the one year filing deadline. In addition, he claimed to have been persecuted in his home country, which also was untrue.

I know that back in the ’90s, some Filipinos filed asylum applications in order to obtain work authorization. Many had the same made-up stories that the NPA was after them, which was untrue. As you can see from this case, such asylum claims are considered frivolous and could have serious consequences, and come back to haunt you.

If you have ever filed for political asylum, claiming that you were persecuted in the Philippines, but are now pursuing a green card through other avenues, I would strongly suggest that you consult with an immigration attorney, who can evaluate your situation, and advise you on the best course of action. As you can see from this case, filing a frivolous asylum claim, even if just to obtain work authorization, could mean a lifetime ban.

*      *      *

WEBSITE: www.gurfinkel.com

Four offices to serve you:  PHILIPPINES: 8940258 or 8940239; LOS ANGELES; SAN FRANCISCO;NEW YORK: TOLL FREE NUMBER: 1-866-GURFINKEL (1-866-487-3465).

 

 

APPLICATION

ASYLUM

CASE

CLAIM

FILED

IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT

PERSECUTED

PERSON

SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

  • Latest
  • Trending
Latest
Latest
abtest
Recommended
Are you sure you want to log out?
X
Login

Philstar.com is one of the most vibrant, opinionated, discerning communities of readers on cyberspace. With your meaningful insights, help shape the stories that can shape the country. Sign up now!

Get Updated:

Signup for the News Round now

FORGOT PASSWORD?
SIGN IN
or sign in with