Strange twist in Ecleo murder puzzles clan
May 17, 2004 | 12:00am
While nobody was looking, the parricide trial of cult leader Ruben Ecleo Jr. took a mysterious turn one that not only breaks court rules but also raises doubts if justice will prevail.
Ecleo, supreme master of the Philippine Benevolent Missionaries Association, is indicted for murdering his wife Alona Bacolod in Jan. 2002. Last April Judge Anacleto Caminade, RTC Branch 11 in Cebu City, granted him bail in the nonbailable heinous offense, for treatment of hypertension.
But thats not the caper. On May 7, from the mountain town of Barili 60 kms from Cebu City, came a ruling from another court. Judge Idelfonso Suerte, RTC Branch 60, sentenced Cedric Devinadera to prison for four to eight years, for accessory to murder. The conviction stemmed from Devinaderas confession that Alonas brother Ben Bacolod had strangled her while he served as lookout. The supposed slaying took place in the vicinity of Mantalongon, Dalaguete and Dumanjug, towns within Judge Suertes jurisdiction.
The Bacolod family was stunned. They never knew that Ben and his pal Devinadera had ever been charged. Equally uninformed was NBI-Central Visayas chief Reynaldo Esmeralda, although Devinadera was in his custody from Dec. 2003 to Apr. 2004, two weeks before the sentencing. Their attention was on the trial in Cebu City, where other members of the Bacolod clan also were massacred days after Alonas mutilated body was found in a trashbag.
Ricky Bacolod, another brother of Alona, surmised that a cousin might have been paid off to file the case in Barili. Ecleos defense has always been that the Bacolods had done Alona in, not him.
The cousin has refused to leave Dinagat Isle, Surigao, headquarters of Ecleos cult and where the Ecleos hold various positions in government. The Bacolods had once been cult members in Cebu, but left after a tiff with Ecleo. Alona was killed soon afterwards. Authorities arrested Ecleo at the Dinagat palace, but not before cult members attacked them with guns and machetes. While police were gathering evidence on Alonas murder, still more cult members attacked the Bacolod home in Cebu.
Rickys conjectures notwithstanding, it is puzzling that a trial in Barili would proceed without informing the Bacolods or the NBI. More than that, that a trial of a side case would proceed at all.
Under court rules, any side case is supposed to be subsumed by the main case. And a court thats hearing the main case shall take over the side case as well. In a libel suit, the one for civil damages should be taken over by the court thats trying the criminal case. All in the interest of swift and clear justice. More so in a murder case.
In the Ecleo case, Devinadera should have undergone preliminary investigation by the Cebu city prosecutor. If probable cause is determined, only then would he be charged with accessory to murder. And the case against Ecleo would have been dropped. Or the Bacolods would have challenged Devinaderas confession. As it is, NBIs Esmeralda is saying that Devinaderas story is "impossible and uncorroborated." At any rate, the judge in Cebu would have the last say.
Of course, the judge in Barili, along with the prosecutor there perhaps, would insist on jurisdiction. And it is from such technicalities, not the spirit of the law, that justice often is blunted.
Judges and prosecutors are lawyers. And the law, it is often said, is too serious a business to be left alone to lawyers. For theres always the possibility that theyll twist and turn the law to suit their ends, and never run out of arguments for it.
Consider the act of Manguindanao Rep. Didagen Dilangalen, a senatorial candidate of the opposition KNP and a lawyer.
Dilangalen charged into the Cotabato city hall Wednesday night and ordered his men to seize three ballot boxes, calling it "citizens arrest". The boxes came from Notre Dame Villages polling precincts 317-A, 317-C and 318-C. In it were ballots and election returns proofs, Dilangalen claimed, that he and his party mates were winning the election, contrary to trending by Namfrel and media quick counts.
Dilangalen said he would submit the boxes for "public judgment". Only by authority of the Comelec central office in Manila may the boxes be released from "citizens custody".
"I am a lawyer," he justified the virtual snatching of ballot boxes akin to what communist rebels and Moro separatists do in their controlled areas, "I know what Im doing."
Yes, of course he does. Hes a lawyer. He can scan all his law books and discover a section somewhere to buttress his act.
But what if a nonlawyer, also in the name of citizens arrest, were to similarly grab three ballot boxes from the board of canvassers? And what if that nonlawyer is with Dilangalens opponents camp? Would he not find another passage in the law books aha, the Omnibus Election Code that prohibits the snatching of boxes and prescribes a 12-year prison term for the perpetrator? Would he not demand that the Comelec perpetually bar the culprit from voting and being voted upon? And will he not cry that the snatching was an act of election terrorism?
Take another lawyer, for that matter, the KNP spokesman who said that the Namfrel and media quick counts made it appear that Fernando Poe Jr. was trailing behind Gloria Arroyo, when their own count showed otherwise. "Theyre conditioning the public mind to accept an Arroyo victory," he shouted, "they must stop this farce."
In those same quick counts, lawyers Juan Ponce Enrile and Aquilino Pimentel Jr. of the KNP were also leading the senatorial race. Can the lawyer-spokesman please tell the two to renounce their leads because they, too, are part of the farce?
Catch Linawin Natin, Mondays at 11 p.m., on IBC-13.
E-mail: [email protected]
Ecleo, supreme master of the Philippine Benevolent Missionaries Association, is indicted for murdering his wife Alona Bacolod in Jan. 2002. Last April Judge Anacleto Caminade, RTC Branch 11 in Cebu City, granted him bail in the nonbailable heinous offense, for treatment of hypertension.
But thats not the caper. On May 7, from the mountain town of Barili 60 kms from Cebu City, came a ruling from another court. Judge Idelfonso Suerte, RTC Branch 60, sentenced Cedric Devinadera to prison for four to eight years, for accessory to murder. The conviction stemmed from Devinaderas confession that Alonas brother Ben Bacolod had strangled her while he served as lookout. The supposed slaying took place in the vicinity of Mantalongon, Dalaguete and Dumanjug, towns within Judge Suertes jurisdiction.
The Bacolod family was stunned. They never knew that Ben and his pal Devinadera had ever been charged. Equally uninformed was NBI-Central Visayas chief Reynaldo Esmeralda, although Devinadera was in his custody from Dec. 2003 to Apr. 2004, two weeks before the sentencing. Their attention was on the trial in Cebu City, where other members of the Bacolod clan also were massacred days after Alonas mutilated body was found in a trashbag.
Ricky Bacolod, another brother of Alona, surmised that a cousin might have been paid off to file the case in Barili. Ecleos defense has always been that the Bacolods had done Alona in, not him.
The cousin has refused to leave Dinagat Isle, Surigao, headquarters of Ecleos cult and where the Ecleos hold various positions in government. The Bacolods had once been cult members in Cebu, but left after a tiff with Ecleo. Alona was killed soon afterwards. Authorities arrested Ecleo at the Dinagat palace, but not before cult members attacked them with guns and machetes. While police were gathering evidence on Alonas murder, still more cult members attacked the Bacolod home in Cebu.
Rickys conjectures notwithstanding, it is puzzling that a trial in Barili would proceed without informing the Bacolods or the NBI. More than that, that a trial of a side case would proceed at all.
Under court rules, any side case is supposed to be subsumed by the main case. And a court thats hearing the main case shall take over the side case as well. In a libel suit, the one for civil damages should be taken over by the court thats trying the criminal case. All in the interest of swift and clear justice. More so in a murder case.
In the Ecleo case, Devinadera should have undergone preliminary investigation by the Cebu city prosecutor. If probable cause is determined, only then would he be charged with accessory to murder. And the case against Ecleo would have been dropped. Or the Bacolods would have challenged Devinaderas confession. As it is, NBIs Esmeralda is saying that Devinaderas story is "impossible and uncorroborated." At any rate, the judge in Cebu would have the last say.
Of course, the judge in Barili, along with the prosecutor there perhaps, would insist on jurisdiction. And it is from such technicalities, not the spirit of the law, that justice often is blunted.
Consider the act of Manguindanao Rep. Didagen Dilangalen, a senatorial candidate of the opposition KNP and a lawyer.
Dilangalen charged into the Cotabato city hall Wednesday night and ordered his men to seize three ballot boxes, calling it "citizens arrest". The boxes came from Notre Dame Villages polling precincts 317-A, 317-C and 318-C. In it were ballots and election returns proofs, Dilangalen claimed, that he and his party mates were winning the election, contrary to trending by Namfrel and media quick counts.
Dilangalen said he would submit the boxes for "public judgment". Only by authority of the Comelec central office in Manila may the boxes be released from "citizens custody".
"I am a lawyer," he justified the virtual snatching of ballot boxes akin to what communist rebels and Moro separatists do in their controlled areas, "I know what Im doing."
Yes, of course he does. Hes a lawyer. He can scan all his law books and discover a section somewhere to buttress his act.
But what if a nonlawyer, also in the name of citizens arrest, were to similarly grab three ballot boxes from the board of canvassers? And what if that nonlawyer is with Dilangalens opponents camp? Would he not find another passage in the law books aha, the Omnibus Election Code that prohibits the snatching of boxes and prescribes a 12-year prison term for the perpetrator? Would he not demand that the Comelec perpetually bar the culprit from voting and being voted upon? And will he not cry that the snatching was an act of election terrorism?
In those same quick counts, lawyers Juan Ponce Enrile and Aquilino Pimentel Jr. of the KNP were also leading the senatorial race. Can the lawyer-spokesman please tell the two to renounce their leads because they, too, are part of the farce?
BrandSpace Articles
<
>
- Latest
- Trending
Trending
Latest
Trending
By Korean Serenade | By Lee Sang-Hwa | 14 hours ago
By FIRST PERSON | By Alex Magno | 1 day ago
Latest
By FOOD FOR THOUGHT | By Chit U. Juan | 1 day ago
By AT GROUND LEVEL | By Satur C. Ocampo | 1 day ago
Recommended