+ Follow RFE Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 259618
[Title] => USCIS headquarters clarifies recent RFE and ability to pay memos
[Summary] =>
Recently, I wrote about two new memos from the Headquarters of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS), dealing with requests for evidence (RFEs) and an employers "ability to pay" the wage in labor certification cases.
[DatePublished] => 2004-08-01 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134402
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1805111
[AuthorName] => Michael J. Gurfinkel
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 252791
[Title] => Immigration officers instructed to deny cases outright
[Summary] => In a memo dated May 4, 2004, from USCIS headquarters in Washington DC, immigration officers were instructed to deny applications or petitions outright, rather than ask for additional information or documentation, in cases where there is "evidence of clear ineligibility", or "the record is incomplete".
[DatePublished] => 2004-06-06 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134402
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1805111
[AuthorName] => Michael J. Gurfinkel
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
RFE
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 259618
[Title] => USCIS headquarters clarifies recent RFE and ability to pay memos
[Summary] =>
Recently, I wrote about two new memos from the Headquarters of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS), dealing with requests for evidence (RFEs) and an employers "ability to pay" the wage in labor certification cases.
[DatePublished] => 2004-08-01 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134402
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1805111
[AuthorName] => Michael J. Gurfinkel
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 252791
[Title] => Immigration officers instructed to deny cases outright
[Summary] => In a memo dated May 4, 2004, from USCIS headquarters in Washington DC, immigration officers were instructed to deny applications or petitions outright, rather than ask for additional information or documentation, in cases where there is "evidence of clear ineligibility", or "the record is incomplete".
[DatePublished] => 2004-06-06 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134402
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1805111
[AuthorName] => Michael J. Gurfinkel
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest