MS. DE GUZMAN

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1388971
                    [Title] => Meticulous audit
                    [Summary] => 
Ms. Sara Soliven De Guzman, in an opinion piece entitled “Kickbacks are what they live for,” published in your paper on Nov. 3, 2014, pointed to pre-audit as an internal check against corrupt practices in government transactions.

                    [DatePublished] => 2014-11-07 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 0
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 
                    [AuthorName] => 
                    [SectionName] => Letters to the Editor
                    [SectionUrl] => letters-to-the-editor
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1381133
                    [Title] => Senate’s works undeniably relevant
                    [Summary] => 
While we respect Ms. Sara Soliven De Guzman’s views and insights on the Senate’s performance during the present 16th Congress as documented on her October 13, column titled “The 16th Congress — Did our tax money go to waste?

                    [DatePublished] => 2014-10-17 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 0
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 
                    [AuthorName] => 
                    [SectionName] => Letters to the Editor
                    [SectionUrl] => letters-to-the-editor
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [2] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 699852
                    [Title] => DSWD is protecting the welfare of PWDs
                    [Summary] => 
Dear Ms. De Guzman:  
This refers to your column item entitled, “The disabled-ignored and discriminated” which was published on June 6, 2011.
                    [DatePublished] => 2011-06-27 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1659424
                    [AuthorName] => Prescila R. Villa, Director Social Marketing Service, DSWD
                    [SectionName] => Letters to the Editor
                    [SectionUrl] => letters-to-the-editor
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [3] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 357684
                    [Title] => Giving family planning a human face
                    [Summary] => 
A ‘loveless’ loveteam that clicks – and how!
As of August 2002, family planning was not openly discussed, and there was a prevalence of misconceptions on family planning methods.
                    [DatePublished] => 2006-09-12 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 134209
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804859
                    [AuthorName] => Domini M. Torrevillas
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Meticulous audit

November 7, 2014 - 12:00am

Ms. Sara Soliven De Guzman, in an opinion piece entitled “Kickbacks are what they live for,” published in your paper on Nov. 3, 2014, pointed to pre-audit as an internal check against corrupt practices...

Letters to the Editor

Senate’s works undeniably relevant

October 17, 2014 - 12:00am

While we respect Ms. Sara Soliven De Guzman’s views and insights on the Senate’s performance during the present 16th Congress as documented on her October 13, column titled “The 16th Congress —...

Letters to the Editor

DSWD is protecting the welfare of PWDs

By Prescila R. Villa, Director Social Marketing Service, DSWD | June 27, 2011 - 12:00am

Dear Ms. De Guzman: This refers to your column item entitled, “The disabled-ignored and discriminated” which was published on June 6, 2011.

Letters to the Editor

Giving family planning a human face

By FROM THE STANDS | By Domini M. Torrevillas | September 12, 2006 - 12:00am

A ‘loveless’ loveteam that clicks – and how! As of August 2002, family planning was not openly discussed, and there was a prevalence of misconceptions on family planning methods.

Opinion