+ Follow JUSTICE TEEHANKEE Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 572053
[Title] => A non-lawyer's view of the Chief Justice appointment
[Summary] => I have observed in many instances that people create their own problem.
[DatePublished] => 2010-05-05 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1415318
[AuthorName] => Jose G. Araullo
[SectionName] => Letters to the Editor
[SectionUrl] => letters-to-the-editor
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 326494
[Title] => Interrogation of women journalists: Good or bad?
[Summary] => By a strange twist of events, I was preparing a lecture on the Philippine media during the martial law period (September 1971-August 1982) when the state of national emergency was declared on Feb. 24, 2006. One’s immediate reaction was that martial law would not be far behind. The memory of the suppression of the press under martial law rushed back to one’s consciousness, and to the resolve that one should never allow that to happen ever again.
[DatePublished] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134209
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804859
[AuthorName] => Domini M. Torrevillas
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 301721
[Title] => Powder keg
[Summary] => One of the guarantees inviolably enshrined in the Bill of Rights of the past and present constitutions of our republic is that "No Law shall be passed abridging…the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the Government for redress of grievances". "Abridge" in any parlance and as used in this Constitutional provision simply means to "curtail, cut down, prune or reduce". Thus in the case of J.B.L. Reyes vs.
[DatePublished] => 2005-10-14 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
JUSTICE TEEHANKEE
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 572053
[Title] => A non-lawyer's view of the Chief Justice appointment
[Summary] => I have observed in many instances that people create their own problem.
[DatePublished] => 2010-05-05 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1415318
[AuthorName] => Jose G. Araullo
[SectionName] => Letters to the Editor
[SectionUrl] => letters-to-the-editor
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 326494
[Title] => Interrogation of women journalists: Good or bad?
[Summary] => By a strange twist of events, I was preparing a lecture on the Philippine media during the martial law period (September 1971-August 1982) when the state of national emergency was declared on Feb. 24, 2006. One’s immediate reaction was that martial law would not be far behind. The memory of the suppression of the press under martial law rushed back to one’s consciousness, and to the resolve that one should never allow that to happen ever again.
[DatePublished] => 2006-03-16 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134209
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804859
[AuthorName] => Domini M. Torrevillas
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 301721
[Title] => Powder keg
[Summary] => One of the guarantees inviolably enshrined in the Bill of Rights of the past and present constitutions of our republic is that "No Law shall be passed abridging…the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the Government for redress of grievances". "Abridge" in any parlance and as used in this Constitutional provision simply means to "curtail, cut down, prune or reduce". Thus in the case of J.B.L. Reyes vs.
[DatePublished] => 2005-10-14 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
