Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1406397
                    [Title] => Muzzling speech in Bangladesh
                    [Summary] => 
The fine is modest, about $65, but the message from Bangladesh’s International Crimes Tribunal is ominous: anyone who challenges — however legitimately, however respectfully — the official number of three million people killed during the 1971 Bangladesh war for independence is guilty of contempt of court.

                    [DatePublished] => 2014-12-25 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 0
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 
                    [AuthorName] => 
                    [SectionName] => Letters to the Editor
                    [SectionUrl] => letters-to-the-editor
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

DAVID BERGMAN

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1406397
                    [Title] => Muzzling speech in Bangladesh
                    [Summary] => 
The fine is modest, about $65, but the message from Bangladesh’s International Crimes Tribunal is ominous: anyone who challenges — however legitimately, however respectfully — the official number of three million people killed during the 1971 Bangladesh war for independence is guilty of contempt of court.

                    [DatePublished] => 2014-12-25 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 0
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 
                    [AuthorName] => 
                    [SectionName] => Letters to the Editor
                    [SectionUrl] => letters-to-the-editor
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Muzzling speech in Bangladesh

December 25, 2014 - 12:00am

The fine is modest, about $65, but the message from Bangladesh’s International Crimes Tribunal is ominous: anyone who challenges — however legitimately, however respectfully — the official number...

Letters to the Editor