+ Follow CHECK NO Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 887870
[Title] => Ex-Cebu lawmaker, 6 others face graft, malversation raps
[Summary] => For allegedly misappropriating P10 million originally intended for a project of the Girl Scouts of the Philippines (GSP) in Cebu, former Cebu congresswoman Clavel Asas-Martinez and six others are facing charges of graft and malversation before the Sandiganbayan.
[DatePublished] => 2012-12-20 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 0
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1685860
[AuthorName] => Rhodina Villanueva
[SectionName] => Nation
[SectionUrl] => nation
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 401322
[Title] => Legal veil
[Summary] => Is the president of a corporation who issues bouncing checks in payment of corporate obligations civilly liable for the ...
[DatePublished] => 2008-09-18 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 361393
[Title] => Family of slain boy only receives P200 assistance
[Summary] =>
The family of a 12-year-old boy who was tortured to death by another minor in Asturias town only received P200 financial assistance from the local government instead of the P10,000 released for them.
Barangay Captain Camilo Dacaldacal and kagawad Hercules Tampos of Sta. Rita, Asturias brought the case of couple Wilhemino and Virginia Miano during the regular session of the Sangguniang Bayan on August 28.
[DatePublished] => 2006-10-04 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Cebu News
[SectionUrl] => cebu-news
[URL] =>
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 319696
[Title] => Tumalbog na tseke
[Summary] => GUMAGAMIT si Jimmy ng Equitable Card Network Inc. (ECN) na may credit line na P499,000.00. Sa simula, maganda ang record ni Jimmy subalit nasira ito nang umabot na sa P1,035,590.28 ang naging utang niya sa ECN. Pinagbabayad na siya ng ECN subalit iginiit niyang may pagkakamali sa naging kuwenta ng kanyang utang kaya hindi ito dapat umabot sa malaking halaga. Sinubukan ni Jimmy na pumasok sa isang kasunduan sa ECN kung saan nag-isyu siya ng tatlong tseke pabor sa ECN. Ang unang tsekeng inisyu ni Jimmy ay Far East Bank (FEBTC) Check No.
[DatePublished] => 2006-02-02 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[4] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 319395
[Title] => Tsekeng walang pondo
[Summary] => MAG-AALAHAS ang matalik na magkaibigang sina Lani at Josie. Minsan, pinuntahan ng dalawa si Myrna upang papalitan ang mga tseke ni Lani. Ginarantiya ni Josie si Myrna na magaling magbayad si Lani at kaibigan niya itong matalik kaya napapayag si Myrna na palitan ng pera ang tatlong postdated checks na inisyu sa kanya ni Lani: EB Check No. 237936 sa halagang P40,000 (September 30, 1992); EB Check No. 237941 sa halagang P16,200; at BPI Check No. 656602 sa halagang P40,000 (November 18, 1992).
[DatePublished] => 2006-01-31 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[5] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 318512
[Title] => Fatal admission
[Summary] => The purpose of the notice of dishonor of a check that bounced is to create the presumption of knowledge by the drawer or issuer that at the time he issued the check, he has no sufficient funds in the drawee bank which is one of the essential elements of the crime of violation of the Bouncing Checks Law. Proof of notice is necessary since the presumption arises when the drawer fails to make good said check or replace it with cash within five days from such notice. This case of Lani however illustrates that even without such notice the drawer could still be held liable for the said crime.
[DatePublished] => 2006-01-26 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[6] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 318182
[Title] => Premature notice
[Summary] => One of the essential elements of the violation of the Bouncing Checks Law is knowledge of insufficiency of funds at the time of the issuance of the check. Since such knowledge is hard to prove as it entails probing into the mind of the issuer, the law creates a prima facie evidence that when the check is presented within 90 days from its date and it is dishonored, the drawer is presumed to have knowledge of insufficiency of funds if he is notified of such dishonor and he did not redeem or make good the check within five days from notice.
[DatePublished] => 2006-01-24 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[7] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 317755
[Title] => Maling hatol
[Summary] => ISA sa tatlong tsekeng inisyu ni Jimmy bilang bayad sa kanyang utang sa Equitable Card Network Inc. (ECN) ay ang Far East Bank and Trust Co. (FEBTC) Check No. 369403 na may petsang May 12, 1993 pabor sa ECN. Inisyu ni Jimmy ang tsekeng ito noong April 7, 1993 bilang tanda ng maganda niyang layunin at bilang pangako sa pagtupad ng kanyang obligasyon hanggang August 1993 habang inaayos pa ang pagkukuwenta ng kanyang utang sa ECN. Ayon kay Jimmy, ang tsekeng ito ay hindi para papalitan kundi isa lamang pagpapahayag ng kanyang katapatan sa pagbabayad ng kanyang obligasyon.
[DatePublished] => 2006-01-21 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[8] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 317381
[Title] => Wrong charge
[Summary] => The first element in the violation of the Bouncing Checks Law is the making and issuance of a check to apply on account or for value. This case of Jimmy is again an example of the lack of this element.
[DatePublished] => 2006-01-19 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[9] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 317206
[Title] => Un-presumed element
[Summary] => One of the elements for violation of the Bouncing Checks Law is that the person issuing the check knew at the time of the issuance of the check that he did not have sufficient funds or credit with the drawee bank for the payment of the check in full upon its presentment.
[DatePublished] => 2006-01-18 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
CHECK NO
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 887870
[Title] => Ex-Cebu lawmaker, 6 others face graft, malversation raps
[Summary] => For allegedly misappropriating P10 million originally intended for a project of the Girl Scouts of the Philippines (GSP) in Cebu, former Cebu congresswoman Clavel Asas-Martinez and six others are facing charges of graft and malversation before the Sandiganbayan.
[DatePublished] => 2012-12-20 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 0
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1685860
[AuthorName] => Rhodina Villanueva
[SectionName] => Nation
[SectionUrl] => nation
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 401322
[Title] => Legal veil
[Summary] => Is the president of a corporation who issues bouncing checks in payment of corporate obligations civilly liable for the ...
[DatePublished] => 2008-09-18 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 361393
[Title] => Family of slain boy only receives P200 assistance
[Summary] =>
The family of a 12-year-old boy who was tortured to death by another minor in Asturias town only received P200 financial assistance from the local government instead of the P10,000 released for them.
Barangay Captain Camilo Dacaldacal and kagawad Hercules Tampos of Sta. Rita, Asturias brought the case of couple Wilhemino and Virginia Miano during the regular session of the Sangguniang Bayan on August 28.
[DatePublished] => 2006-10-04 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Cebu News
[SectionUrl] => cebu-news
[URL] =>
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 319696
[Title] => Tumalbog na tseke
[Summary] => GUMAGAMIT si Jimmy ng Equitable Card Network Inc. (ECN) na may credit line na P499,000.00. Sa simula, maganda ang record ni Jimmy subalit nasira ito nang umabot na sa P1,035,590.28 ang naging utang niya sa ECN. Pinagbabayad na siya ng ECN subalit iginiit niyang may pagkakamali sa naging kuwenta ng kanyang utang kaya hindi ito dapat umabot sa malaking halaga. Sinubukan ni Jimmy na pumasok sa isang kasunduan sa ECN kung saan nag-isyu siya ng tatlong tseke pabor sa ECN. Ang unang tsekeng inisyu ni Jimmy ay Far East Bank (FEBTC) Check No.
[DatePublished] => 2006-02-02 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[4] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 319395
[Title] => Tsekeng walang pondo
[Summary] => MAG-AALAHAS ang matalik na magkaibigang sina Lani at Josie. Minsan, pinuntahan ng dalawa si Myrna upang papalitan ang mga tseke ni Lani. Ginarantiya ni Josie si Myrna na magaling magbayad si Lani at kaibigan niya itong matalik kaya napapayag si Myrna na palitan ng pera ang tatlong postdated checks na inisyu sa kanya ni Lani: EB Check No. 237936 sa halagang P40,000 (September 30, 1992); EB Check No. 237941 sa halagang P16,200; at BPI Check No. 656602 sa halagang P40,000 (November 18, 1992).
[DatePublished] => 2006-01-31 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[5] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 318512
[Title] => Fatal admission
[Summary] => The purpose of the notice of dishonor of a check that bounced is to create the presumption of knowledge by the drawer or issuer that at the time he issued the check, he has no sufficient funds in the drawee bank which is one of the essential elements of the crime of violation of the Bouncing Checks Law. Proof of notice is necessary since the presumption arises when the drawer fails to make good said check or replace it with cash within five days from such notice. This case of Lani however illustrates that even without such notice the drawer could still be held liable for the said crime.
[DatePublished] => 2006-01-26 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[6] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 318182
[Title] => Premature notice
[Summary] => One of the essential elements of the violation of the Bouncing Checks Law is knowledge of insufficiency of funds at the time of the issuance of the check. Since such knowledge is hard to prove as it entails probing into the mind of the issuer, the law creates a prima facie evidence that when the check is presented within 90 days from its date and it is dishonored, the drawer is presumed to have knowledge of insufficiency of funds if he is notified of such dishonor and he did not redeem or make good the check within five days from notice.
[DatePublished] => 2006-01-24 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[7] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 317755
[Title] => Maling hatol
[Summary] => ISA sa tatlong tsekeng inisyu ni Jimmy bilang bayad sa kanyang utang sa Equitable Card Network Inc. (ECN) ay ang Far East Bank and Trust Co. (FEBTC) Check No. 369403 na may petsang May 12, 1993 pabor sa ECN. Inisyu ni Jimmy ang tsekeng ito noong April 7, 1993 bilang tanda ng maganda niyang layunin at bilang pangako sa pagtupad ng kanyang obligasyon hanggang August 1993 habang inaayos pa ang pagkukuwenta ng kanyang utang sa ECN. Ayon kay Jimmy, ang tsekeng ito ay hindi para papalitan kundi isa lamang pagpapahayag ng kanyang katapatan sa pagbabayad ng kanyang obligasyon.
[DatePublished] => 2006-01-21 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[8] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 317381
[Title] => Wrong charge
[Summary] => The first element in the violation of the Bouncing Checks Law is the making and issuance of a check to apply on account or for value. This case of Jimmy is again an example of the lack of this element.
[DatePublished] => 2006-01-19 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[9] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 317206
[Title] => Un-presumed element
[Summary] => One of the elements for violation of the Bouncing Checks Law is that the person issuing the check knew at the time of the issuance of the check that he did not have sufficient funds or credit with the drawee bank for the payment of the check in full upon its presentment.
[DatePublished] => 2006-01-18 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
October 4, 2006 - 12:00am
