+ Follow ANTI GRAFT LAW Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 798122
[Title] => House to defy any suspension order on GMA
[Summary] => The House of Representatives will not enforce any suspension order against former President and now Pampanga Rep. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo even if the Sandiganbayan grants the petition of the Office of the Ombudsman urging her suspension from the legislative chamber.
[DatePublished] => 2012-04-19 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1805432
[AuthorName] => Paolo Romero
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 679460
[Title] => P530-M plunder vs GMA isinampa
[Summary] => Sinampahan ng kasong plunder sa Department of Justice (DOJ) si dating Pangulong Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, dalawang dating Cabinet official at ang Overseas Workers Welfare Administration (OWWA) hinggil sa P530 milyong pondo ng nasabing ahensiya.
[DatePublished] => 2011-04-27 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1096851
[AuthorName] => Doris Franche-Borja
[SectionName] => Bansa
[SectionUrl] => bansa
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 632890
[Title] => Mistake in good faith
[Summary] => Not every error or mistake committed by a judge or justice renders him administratively liable. It must be shown that he committed it in bad faith or with deliberate intent, fraud, dishonesty or corruption.
[DatePublished] => 2010-11-25 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 549405
[Title] => Plunder vs ex-SC Justice
[Summary] => Sinampahan sa Ombudsman ng kasong plunder si dating Supreme Court Associate Justice Dante Tinga.
[DatePublished] => 2010-02-15 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Bansa
[SectionUrl] => bansa
[URL] =>
)
[4] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 438313
[Title] => Tanod ng Malacañang, not Tanodbayan
[Summary] => If the stench of corruption is getting stronger and more obnoxious nowadays it is not only because of the government agencies and the people involved in the shady deals and corrupt acts.
[DatePublished] => 2009-02-09 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[5] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 362074
[Title] => Cosmetics
[Summary] => No amount of evidence that "speaks for itself" can cosmetize the patent error and give the appearance of correctness to the acrobatic stunt displayed by the Office of the Ombudsman on the ACM case. Something fishy keeps on cropping up by simply looking at the big picture. The act of flip-flopping alone is in itself facially irregular. The initial June 2006 resolution was issued after almost two years of investigation as ordered by the Supreme Court. Two years of investigation is definitely more than enough to gather all the evidence to determine the liability of those involved.
[DatePublished] => 2006-10-09 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[6] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 261837
[Title] => Lack of motive
[Summary] => One of the corrupt practices punishable by the Anti Graft Law ( RA 3019) is "neglecting or refusing, after due demand or without justification, to act within a reasonable time on any matter pending before him for the purpose of obtaining directly or indirectly from any person interested in the matter some pecuniary or material advantage in favor of, or discriminating against another interested party" (Section 3 [f]). This case of Conrado enumerates the essential elements of this offense.
[DatePublished] => 2004-08-19 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[7] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 232954
[Title] => SC issues TRO on suspension of DPWH chief
[Summary] => The Sandiganbayan has held in abeyance its order suspending Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) Secretary Florante Soriquez and four others over the P2.7-billion Pampanga megadike scam after the Supreme Court issued a temporary restraining order stopping the project’s implementation.
In a one-page resolution, the anti-graft court’s fifth division said the administrative sanction imposed on Soriquez and supervising engineers Rey David, Ulysis Maniago, Juan Gonzales and Gil Rivera is "held in abeyance until further orders from the Supreme Court."
[DatePublished] => 2003-12-26 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1096652
[AuthorName] => Delon Porcalla
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
[8] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 225037
[Title] => Missing complainant
[Summary] => In administrative investigations, is it necessary that complainant be present so that he can be confronted and cross examined by the respondent? Can a respondent be investigated and later on dismissed on the basis of an unverified letter complaint? These are the questions answered in this case of Rolando (not his true name).
[DatePublished] => 2003-10-22 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
ANTI GRAFT LAW
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 798122
[Title] => House to defy any suspension order on GMA
[Summary] => The House of Representatives will not enforce any suspension order against former President and now Pampanga Rep. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo even if the Sandiganbayan grants the petition of the Office of the Ombudsman urging her suspension from the legislative chamber.
[DatePublished] => 2012-04-19 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1805432
[AuthorName] => Paolo Romero
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 679460
[Title] => P530-M plunder vs GMA isinampa
[Summary] => Sinampahan ng kasong plunder sa Department of Justice (DOJ) si dating Pangulong Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, dalawang dating Cabinet official at ang Overseas Workers Welfare Administration (OWWA) hinggil sa P530 milyong pondo ng nasabing ahensiya.
[DatePublished] => 2011-04-27 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1096851
[AuthorName] => Doris Franche-Borja
[SectionName] => Bansa
[SectionUrl] => bansa
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 632890
[Title] => Mistake in good faith
[Summary] => Not every error or mistake committed by a judge or justice renders him administratively liable. It must be shown that he committed it in bad faith or with deliberate intent, fraud, dishonesty or corruption.
[DatePublished] => 2010-11-25 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 549405
[Title] => Plunder vs ex-SC Justice
[Summary] => Sinampahan sa Ombudsman ng kasong plunder si dating Supreme Court Associate Justice Dante Tinga.
[DatePublished] => 2010-02-15 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Bansa
[SectionUrl] => bansa
[URL] =>
)
[4] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 438313
[Title] => Tanod ng Malacañang, not Tanodbayan
[Summary] => If the stench of corruption is getting stronger and more obnoxious nowadays it is not only because of the government agencies and the people involved in the shady deals and corrupt acts.
[DatePublished] => 2009-02-09 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[5] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 362074
[Title] => Cosmetics
[Summary] => No amount of evidence that "speaks for itself" can cosmetize the patent error and give the appearance of correctness to the acrobatic stunt displayed by the Office of the Ombudsman on the ACM case. Something fishy keeps on cropping up by simply looking at the big picture. The act of flip-flopping alone is in itself facially irregular. The initial June 2006 resolution was issued after almost two years of investigation as ordered by the Supreme Court. Two years of investigation is definitely more than enough to gather all the evidence to determine the liability of those involved.
[DatePublished] => 2006-10-09 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[6] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 261837
[Title] => Lack of motive
[Summary] => One of the corrupt practices punishable by the Anti Graft Law ( RA 3019) is "neglecting or refusing, after due demand or without justification, to act within a reasonable time on any matter pending before him for the purpose of obtaining directly or indirectly from any person interested in the matter some pecuniary or material advantage in favor of, or discriminating against another interested party" (Section 3 [f]). This case of Conrado enumerates the essential elements of this offense.
[DatePublished] => 2004-08-19 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[7] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 232954
[Title] => SC issues TRO on suspension of DPWH chief
[Summary] => The Sandiganbayan has held in abeyance its order suspending Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) Secretary Florante Soriquez and four others over the P2.7-billion Pampanga megadike scam after the Supreme Court issued a temporary restraining order stopping the project’s implementation.
In a one-page resolution, the anti-graft court’s fifth division said the administrative sanction imposed on Soriquez and supervising engineers Rey David, Ulysis Maniago, Juan Gonzales and Gil Rivera is "held in abeyance until further orders from the Supreme Court."
[DatePublished] => 2003-12-26 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1096652
[AuthorName] => Delon Porcalla
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
[8] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 225037
[Title] => Missing complainant
[Summary] => In administrative investigations, is it necessary that complainant be present so that he can be confronted and cross examined by the respondent? Can a respondent be investigated and later on dismissed on the basis of an unverified letter complaint? These are the questions answered in this case of Rolando (not his true name).
[DatePublished] => 2003-10-22 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
February 15, 2010 - 12:00am
