Serapio seeks wife arrest
May 31, 2001 | 12:00am
While Sandiganbayan justices continue to ponder the kinds of arrest allowed by law, another lawyer added one more ingredient to the thickening soup yesterday, asking the countrys anti-graft court to place him under "wifes arrest" or "Jesuitical arrest."
Edward Serapio, for-mer personal counsel of jailed ex-President Joseph Estrada, claimed the governments moves to block a separate bail hearing were a "virtual refusal to present evidence" that he connived with Estrada to plunder the economy.
Serapio argued, in a 10-page urgent motion, that this shows the weakness of the governments evidence and at least entitles him to be released on bail or on recognizance of his wife, Grace.
If he cannot be released to his wifes loving embrace, Serapio said, he would even be willing to submit himself to the Jesuitic discipline of priest and legal thinker Joaquin Bernas, SJ.
Serapio made the appeal through his lawyer Martin Pison, who noted that his client has been in detention since April 25, or a total of 35 days. Pison claimed the government is trying to delay Serapios bail hearing.
"Immediate release of Serapio on interim bail or upon interim recognizance will not prejudice the State, even as it affords the accused immediate relief from a continuing deprivation of his constitutional right to bail," Pison said in the motion.
Pison said that allowing Serapio to be placed under "wifes arrest" will even promote responsible prosecution since the prosecution will no longer have to resort to "unjust and oppressive tactics."
He said it was oppressive for Serapio to be held under continuing detention while the prosecution continues to block his appeal to have a bail hearing separate from the bail hearing for Estrada and his son Jinggoy, also a co-respondent in the plunder charge.
Serapio maintains that the governments insistence that joint bail hearings be held for the three violates his constitutional right to bail.
But the government maintains that Serapios motion for a separate bail hearing is untimely because he has not even been arraigned on the plunder charge.
Government lawyers also argued that his plea for bail hearing is premature because the Sandiganbayan may grant the prosecutions motion for earlier and simultaneous arraignment of Serapio and the Estradas.
But Serapio argues the prosecution cannot insist on a joint bail hearing because there is no basis for it and it unduly denies him the opportunity to debunk the evidence against him.
Estrada, on the other hand, has made no application for bail and his lawyers are apparently focusing on getting the anti-graft court to allow him to be placed on "resthouse arrest."
While Serapio appears to be seeking to hasten the pre-trial process, Estrada apparently wants to further delay the process with various motions, as some Sandiganbayan justices have noted.
Edward Serapio, for-mer personal counsel of jailed ex-President Joseph Estrada, claimed the governments moves to block a separate bail hearing were a "virtual refusal to present evidence" that he connived with Estrada to plunder the economy.
Serapio argued, in a 10-page urgent motion, that this shows the weakness of the governments evidence and at least entitles him to be released on bail or on recognizance of his wife, Grace.
If he cannot be released to his wifes loving embrace, Serapio said, he would even be willing to submit himself to the Jesuitic discipline of priest and legal thinker Joaquin Bernas, SJ.
Serapio made the appeal through his lawyer Martin Pison, who noted that his client has been in detention since April 25, or a total of 35 days. Pison claimed the government is trying to delay Serapios bail hearing.
"Immediate release of Serapio on interim bail or upon interim recognizance will not prejudice the State, even as it affords the accused immediate relief from a continuing deprivation of his constitutional right to bail," Pison said in the motion.
Pison said that allowing Serapio to be placed under "wifes arrest" will even promote responsible prosecution since the prosecution will no longer have to resort to "unjust and oppressive tactics."
He said it was oppressive for Serapio to be held under continuing detention while the prosecution continues to block his appeal to have a bail hearing separate from the bail hearing for Estrada and his son Jinggoy, also a co-respondent in the plunder charge.
Serapio maintains that the governments insistence that joint bail hearings be held for the three violates his constitutional right to bail.
But the government maintains that Serapios motion for a separate bail hearing is untimely because he has not even been arraigned on the plunder charge.
Government lawyers also argued that his plea for bail hearing is premature because the Sandiganbayan may grant the prosecutions motion for earlier and simultaneous arraignment of Serapio and the Estradas.
But Serapio argues the prosecution cannot insist on a joint bail hearing because there is no basis for it and it unduly denies him the opportunity to debunk the evidence against him.
Estrada, on the other hand, has made no application for bail and his lawyers are apparently focusing on getting the anti-graft court to allow him to be placed on "resthouse arrest."
While Serapio appears to be seeking to hasten the pre-trial process, Estrada apparently wants to further delay the process with various motions, as some Sandiganbayan justices have noted.
BrandSpace Articles
<
>
- Latest
Latest
Latest
August 3, 2024 - 4:43pm
By Joyce Ilas-Reyes | August 3, 2024 - 4:43pm
July 27, 2024 - 5:49pm
By Rupert Paul Manhit | July 27, 2024 - 5:49pm
July 27, 2024 - 5:07pm
By Allen Espinosa | July 27, 2024 - 5:07pm
July 23, 2024 - 11:57am
By Jean Mangaluz | July 23, 2024 - 11:57am
July 13, 2024 - 5:18pm
By Renato Cruz De Castro | July 13, 2024 - 5:18pm
Recommended