Study shows positive impact of biotech crops
February 18, 2007 | 12:00am
After just 10 years of commercialization, biotech crops have made significant, positive impacts on the global environment, according to a new study by Graham Brookes and Peter Barfoot, two UK-based economists.
The study quantifies the cumulative economic and environmental impacts of biotech crops grown during the past decade (1996-2005).
Brookes and Barfoot said biotech crops have contributed to significant environmental benefits from the reduction in overall usage of pesticides. They also noted a significant reduction in the amount of greenhouse gas emissions from biotech crop production.
They also reported that farmers who planted biotech crops realized significant economic gains compared to farmers who planted non-biotech crops.
A key finding of the study revealed that farmers used almost half a billion pounds (224 m kg.) less pesticides with genetically modified (GM) crops since 1996, a reduction of seven percent. This represents about 40 percent of the annual volume of pesticides used in the European Union.
The authors found that the global "environmental impact" of pesticide use has been reduced by over 15 percent due to the planting of biotech crops.
At the same time, biotech crops made a significant contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural practices by nine billion kg of carbon dioxide. "This is the equivalent of removing almost four million cars from the road for one year," the authors pointed out.
The study also showed that in 2005, GM crops have resulted in reduced pesticide use and reduced plowing. "This has reduced fuel usage with biotech crops and resulted in a reduction of almost one billion kilograms of carbon dioxide emission," the authors pointed out.
GM crops have also facilitated the use of reduced tillage or no tillage farming systems, which results in more plant residue being stored, or sequestered, in the soil. This carbon sequestration saved the equivalent of nine billion kilograms of carbon dioxide emission 2005, the study said.
Economically, the report confirms that farmers earned higher incomes in every country where biotech crops are grown. In 2005, farmers who planted biotech crops earned over five billion in incremental income compared with growers who planted non biotech crops.
The study also noted that since 1996, global farm income from biotech crops increased by a cumulative total of $27 billion from a combination of higher productivity and reduced costs.
It noted that farmers in developing countries captured the majority of the extra farm income from biotech crops, mostly from insect resistant cotton and herbicide tolerant soybean.
The study was published in AgBioForum, a peer reviewed journal on economics and biotechnology.
The study quantifies the cumulative economic and environmental impacts of biotech crops grown during the past decade (1996-2005).
Brookes and Barfoot said biotech crops have contributed to significant environmental benefits from the reduction in overall usage of pesticides. They also noted a significant reduction in the amount of greenhouse gas emissions from biotech crop production.
They also reported that farmers who planted biotech crops realized significant economic gains compared to farmers who planted non-biotech crops.
A key finding of the study revealed that farmers used almost half a billion pounds (224 m kg.) less pesticides with genetically modified (GM) crops since 1996, a reduction of seven percent. This represents about 40 percent of the annual volume of pesticides used in the European Union.
The authors found that the global "environmental impact" of pesticide use has been reduced by over 15 percent due to the planting of biotech crops.
At the same time, biotech crops made a significant contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural practices by nine billion kg of carbon dioxide. "This is the equivalent of removing almost four million cars from the road for one year," the authors pointed out.
The study also showed that in 2005, GM crops have resulted in reduced pesticide use and reduced plowing. "This has reduced fuel usage with biotech crops and resulted in a reduction of almost one billion kilograms of carbon dioxide emission," the authors pointed out.
GM crops have also facilitated the use of reduced tillage or no tillage farming systems, which results in more plant residue being stored, or sequestered, in the soil. This carbon sequestration saved the equivalent of nine billion kilograms of carbon dioxide emission 2005, the study said.
Economically, the report confirms that farmers earned higher incomes in every country where biotech crops are grown. In 2005, farmers who planted biotech crops earned over five billion in incremental income compared with growers who planted non biotech crops.
The study also noted that since 1996, global farm income from biotech crops increased by a cumulative total of $27 billion from a combination of higher productivity and reduced costs.
It noted that farmers in developing countries captured the majority of the extra farm income from biotech crops, mostly from insect resistant cotton and herbicide tolerant soybean.
The study was published in AgBioForum, a peer reviewed journal on economics and biotechnology.
BrandSpace Articles
<
>
- Latest
Latest
Latest
March 4, 2024 - 3:32pm
By Ian Laqui | March 4, 2024 - 3:32pm
March 4, 2024 - 2:12pm
By Kristine Daguno-Bersamina | March 4, 2024 - 2:12pm
February 17, 2024 - 2:31pm
February 17, 2024 - 2:31pm
February 13, 2024 - 7:24pm
By Gaea Katreena Cabico | February 13, 2024 - 7:24pm
February 13, 2024 - 7:17pm
By Ian Laqui | February 13, 2024 - 7:17pm
Recommended