Authorities raid ‘online scam hub’

CEBU, Philippines — Authorities raided a suspected scam hub in Barangay Kasambagan on Tuesday afternoon, May 27, 2025, seizing computers and laptops allegedly used for online scamming activities.

The operation was conducted by the Regional Anti-Cybercrime Unit (RACU)-7, Cebu City Police Office (CCPO), Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT), and other government agencies.

Lawmen were armed with a search warrant issued by Regional Trial Court Branch 7 Judge James Stewart Ramon Himalaloan in Cebu City. More than 40 computer units, including laptops, were inspected by RACU-7 operatives during the operation at BMJ Data Processing Services, reportedly operating as a scam hub.

According to Police Lieutenant Colonel Maria Theresa Macatangay, CCPO deputy city director for operations and spokesperson, the search warrant was issued following reports of illegal activity within the company.

The search was based on alleged violations of Republic Act 11765 (Financial Products and Services Consumer Protection Act), in relation to Section 6 of Republic Act 10175 (Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012).

Macatangay said further charges may be filed depending on the outcome of ongoing investigations.

“If evidence proves additional violations were committed by the alleged scam hub, further charges may be filed against them,” she said.

The seized devices have been transferred to the Anti-Cybercrime Group-7’s office, where forensic investigators will extract data from memory devices to identify supporting or additional evidence.

Investigators have already reached out to employees of the company and encouraged them to cooperate.

“This effort aims to inform the public and warn others against becoming involved in similar activities, and to help individuals assess whether the jobs they are entering may be connected to illegal operations,” Macatangay said.

She noted that employees could serve as witnesses—unless evidence surfaces showing they were aware of or involved in illicit activities.

“This is the reason why we are here to assist the employees, and we will extend to them as much help as we can in the investigation, in going after those who used them—if indeed they were victimized in any way,” she added.

Macatangay also assured potential witnesses of protection and support.

“If the employees feel fear, or if they were coerced or intimidated from coming forward to help in the investigation, we urge them not to hesitate or be afraid because we will support them.”

Regarding individuals merely present at the site, Macatangay clarified that presence alone does not establish criminal liability.

“There must be proof they were involved—whether as principals, accomplices, or accessories. For example, evidence that someone tried to hide or tamper with data could elevate their liability,” she explained.

Investigators are now focusing on identifying those directly involved in the company’s operations. Employees such as call center agents may be considered witnesses if they are not involved and are willing to cooperate.

She further said that while no cases have yet been filed against certain employees, warrants may still be issued.

“If that happens, those warrants can be served regardless of where the subjects are located,” Macatangay said. – Romeo Marantal/FPL (FREEMAN)