Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 592749
                    [Title] => Intertwined
                    [Summary] => 
If the opposing parties to a case involving an agricultural land are not the landlords against their tenants or vice versa, is said case still within the jurisdiction of the Department of Agrarian Reform Adjudication Board (DARAB)? This is one of the issues raised and resolved in this case of the heirs of Aling Viring.
                    [DatePublished] => 2010-07-14 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 501146
                    [Title] => Procedural lapse
                    [Summary] => 
This case shows how a marriage bond can be dissolved which after all seems to have been created out of fiction than reality.
                    [DatePublished] => 2009-09-02 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [2] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 396123
                    [Title] => Misappropriation
                    [Summary] => 








When a person receives money in trust under an obligation involving the duty to make delivery of or to return the same and he fails to deliver it as agreed or to return it, upon demand, he is guilty of estafa or swindling under Article 315 (1) (b) of the Revised Penal Code. This case of Tino is an example.


                    [DatePublished] => 2007-04-26 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

TINO AND TINA

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 592749
                    [Title] => Intertwined
                    [Summary] => 
If the opposing parties to a case involving an agricultural land are not the landlords against their tenants or vice versa, is said case still within the jurisdiction of the Department of Agrarian Reform Adjudication Board (DARAB)? This is one of the issues raised and resolved in this case of the heirs of Aling Viring.
                    [DatePublished] => 2010-07-14 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 501146
                    [Title] => Procedural lapse
                    [Summary] => 
This case shows how a marriage bond can be dissolved which after all seems to have been created out of fiction than reality.
                    [DatePublished] => 2009-09-02 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [2] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 396123
                    [Title] => Misappropriation
                    [Summary] => 








When a person receives money in trust under an obligation involving the duty to make delivery of or to return the same and he fails to deliver it as agreed or to return it, upon demand, he is guilty of estafa or swindling under Article 315 (1) (b) of the Revised Penal Code. This case of Tino is an example.


                    [DatePublished] => 2007-04-26 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Intertwined

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | July 14, 2010 - 12:00am

If the opposing parties to a case involving an agricultural land are not the landlords against their tenants or vice versa, is said case still within the jurisdiction of the Department of Agrarian Reform Adjudication...

Opinion

Procedural lapse

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | September 2, 2009 - 12:00am

This case shows how a marriage bond can be dissolved which after all seems to have been created out of fiction than reality.

Opinion

Misappropriation

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | April 26, 2007 - 12:00am

When a person receives money in trust under an obligation involving the duty to make delivery of or to return the same and he fails to deliver it as agreed or to return it, upon demand, he is guilty...

Opinion