Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 218611
                    [Title] => Commercial pollution
                    [Summary] => Where the circumstances of both the offender and the offense clearly indicate good faith or a patent mistake of fact without taint of negligence, the imposition of a fine alone, instead of imprisonment, should be the more appropriate penalty for the violation of the Bouncing Checks Law (BP 22). This is provided in the Supreme Court Administrative Circular 12-2000 as clarified in Adm. Circular 13-2001. And this is what Tito tried to invoke when he was convicted of 12 counts of violation of the said law.


                    [DatePublished] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

SUPREME COURT ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULAR

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 218611
                    [Title] => Commercial pollution
                    [Summary] => Where the circumstances of both the offender and the offense clearly indicate good faith or a patent mistake of fact without taint of negligence, the imposition of a fine alone, instead of imprisonment, should be the more appropriate penalty for the violation of the Bouncing Checks Law (BP 22). This is provided in the Supreme Court Administrative Circular 12-2000 as clarified in Adm. Circular 13-2001. And this is what Tito tried to invoke when he was convicted of 12 counts of violation of the said law.


                    [DatePublished] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Commercial pollution

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | August 26, 2003 - 12:00am

Where the circumstances of both the offender and the offense clearly indicate good faith or a patent mistake of fact without taint of negligence, the imposition of a fine alone, instead of imprisonment, should be...

Opinion