- Philstar.com
- The Philippine Star
- Pilipino Star Ngayon
- The Freeman
- Pang-Masa
- Banat
- Interaksyon
- Coupons
SUPPORT PHILSTAR
About Us |
Contact Us |
Advertise |
Privacy Policy |
Member Agreement |
Copyright Notice
Copyright © 2026. Philstar Global Corp. All Rights Reserved
X
+ Follow STANLEY KRAMER Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 275841
[Title] => Comedy with a capital C
[Summary] => I try to catch remakes of films because I always get a kick out of comparing these to the original versions.
It was with much excitement therefore that I went to see the currently-showing Guess Who only to find out that it is not exactly a remake of the 1967 Stanley Kramer film Guess Whos Coming to Dinner, which is about an elderly white couple (Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn) who has to come to terms with the decision of their daughter Katharine Houghton (Hepburns niece in real life) to marry a black scientist (Sidney Poitier).
[DatePublished] => 2005-04-30 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 135739
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1186451
[AuthorName] => Butch Francisco
[SectionName] => Entertainment
[SectionUrl] => entertainment
[URL] =>
)
)
)
STANLEY KRAMER
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 275841
[Title] => Comedy with a capital C
[Summary] => I try to catch remakes of films because I always get a kick out of comparing these to the original versions.
It was with much excitement therefore that I went to see the currently-showing Guess Who only to find out that it is not exactly a remake of the 1967 Stanley Kramer film Guess Whos Coming to Dinner, which is about an elderly white couple (Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn) who has to come to terms with the decision of their daughter Katharine Houghton (Hepburns niece in real life) to marry a black scientist (Sidney Poitier).
[DatePublished] => 2005-04-30 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 135739
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1186451
[AuthorName] => Butch Francisco
[SectionName] => Entertainment
[SectionUrl] => entertainment
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
By Butch Francisco | April 30, 2005 - 12:00am
Recommended
Despite constitutional prohibition, Vice President Sara Duterte retained her holdings in companies held by her family even after her election in 2022, an official of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) said at the resumption of her impeachment trial yesterday.
13 hours ago
Vice President Sara Duterte has been briefed on the impeachment court’s sub judice rule restricting statements outside Senate proceedings, according to defense spokesman Michael Poa.
13 hours ago
Sara Duterte's trial surfaces a gap that SEC has no mechanism to flag officials’ corporate roles for constitutional conflicts.
19 hours ago
Did Sara Duterte violate the constitutional ban on a vice president participating in business?
20 hours ago
If she remains absent until then, she will have been away from the chamber for 72 days since her last plenary appearance on July 29.
21 hours ago
Lotto Sep 21, 2026
EZ2/LVM - 7 13
SUERTRES -7 9 5
4D LOTTO - 9 1 3 5
6/45 Mega Lotto - 36 43 7 2 28 39
P67,374,234.00
Grand Lotto - 54 17 51 21 37 12
P214,440,141.00
Forex
February 12, 2018
- 12:00 am
- 12:00 am
1$ : P51.66









