Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 201179
                    [Title] => More favorable explanation
                    [Summary] => If the inculpatory facts against an accused are capable of two explanations –  one consistent with a lesser degree of liability and the other consistent with graver responsibility, that with a lesser degree of liability should be adopted because it is more favorable to the accused. This is the rule applied in the case of Gerry who was charged with multiple murder, multiple frustrated murder and multiple attempted murder.


                    [DatePublished] => 2003-04-02 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 200348
                    [Title] => Lawful exercise of a right
                    [Summary] => This case answers the oft-asked questions of purchasers of real property on installment basis covered by postdated checks. Because of possible violation of the Bouncing Checks Law, they are at a quandary on suspending payments if the property they bought turns out to be defective.


This is the case of Gerry who bought a townhouse from FRC Realty payable in 48 monthly installments of P9,304. As required by the contract to sell, Gerry issued 48 postdated checks for the said installments and moved in to his unit.


                    [DatePublished] => 2003-03-26 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

SO GERRY

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 201179
                    [Title] => More favorable explanation
                    [Summary] => If the inculpatory facts against an accused are capable of two explanations –  one consistent with a lesser degree of liability and the other consistent with graver responsibility, that with a lesser degree of liability should be adopted because it is more favorable to the accused. This is the rule applied in the case of Gerry who was charged with multiple murder, multiple frustrated murder and multiple attempted murder.


                    [DatePublished] => 2003-04-02 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 200348
                    [Title] => Lawful exercise of a right
                    [Summary] => This case answers the oft-asked questions of purchasers of real property on installment basis covered by postdated checks. Because of possible violation of the Bouncing Checks Law, they are at a quandary on suspending payments if the property they bought turns out to be defective.


This is the case of Gerry who bought a townhouse from FRC Realty payable in 48 monthly installments of P9,304. As required by the contract to sell, Gerry issued 48 postdated checks for the said installments and moved in to his unit.


                    [DatePublished] => 2003-03-26 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

More favorable explanation

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | April 2, 2003 - 12:00am

If the inculpatory facts against an accused are capable of two explanations – one consistent with a lesser degree of liability and the other consistent with graver responsibility, that with a lesser degree...

Opinion

Lawful exercise of a right

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | March 26, 2003 - 12:00am

This case answers the oft-asked questions of purchasers of real property on installment basis covered by postdated checks. Because of possible violation of the Bouncing Checks Law, they are at a quandary on suspending...

Opinion