Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 636982
                    [Title] => Pregnant, pro-life, and pro-RH
                    [Summary] => 
“So, has your stand on the Reproductive Health (RH) Bill changed because you’re pregnant?”
                    [DatePublished] => 2010-12-08 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 134146
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1440145
                    [AuthorName] => Kay Malilong-Isberto
                    [SectionName] => Freeman Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 527156
                    [Title] => Mandatory Insurance for land-based OFWs (continuation)
                    [Summary] => 
As we reported in our earlier Thursday column, last November 19th, the bicam approved the amendments to the Migrants’ Act, RA 8042, including the mandatory insurance for land-based migrants that migrants and their advocates campaigned so hard against.
                    [DatePublished] => 2009-11-28 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133239
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1223596
                    [AuthorName] => Cherry Piquero Ballescas
                    [SectionName] => Freeman Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

REPRESENTATIVE EDCEL LAGMAN

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 636982
                    [Title] => Pregnant, pro-life, and pro-RH
                    [Summary] => 
“So, has your stand on the Reproductive Health (RH) Bill changed because you’re pregnant?”
                    [DatePublished] => 2010-12-08 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 134146
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1440145
                    [AuthorName] => Kay Malilong-Isberto
                    [SectionName] => Freeman Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 527156
                    [Title] => Mandatory Insurance for land-based OFWs (continuation)
                    [Summary] => 
As we reported in our earlier Thursday column, last November 19th, the bicam approved the amendments to the Migrants’ Act, RA 8042, including the mandatory insurance for land-based migrants that migrants and their advocates campaigned so hard against.
                    [DatePublished] => 2009-11-28 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133239
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1223596
                    [AuthorName] => Cherry Piquero Ballescas
                    [SectionName] => Freeman Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Pregnant, pro-life, and pro-RH

By Kay Malilong-Isberto | December 8, 2010 - 12:00am

“So, has your stand on the Reproductive Health (RH) Bill changed because you’re pregnant?”

Freeman Opinion

Mandatory Insurance for land-based OFWs (continuation)

By Cherry Piquero Ballescas | November 28, 2009 - 12:00am

As we reported in our earlier Thursday column, last November 19th, the bicam approved the amendments to the Migrants’ Act, RA 8042, including the mandatory insurance for land-based migrants that migrants and...

Freeman Opinion