+ Follow PEOPLE G Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 594663
[Title] => Inconsequential
[Summary] => Is the cause or reason for the issuance of a check material in determining liability under the bouncing checks law? This is one of the issues raised and answered in this case of Lina.
[DatePublished] => 2010-07-20 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 356440
[Title] => Too late
[Summary] => In the crime of malversation, all that is necessary for conviction is sufficient proof that the accountable officer has received public funds, that he does not have them in his possession when demand for such funds is made and that he cannot satisfactorily explain his failure to do so. This is illustrated in this case of Danny.
[DatePublished] => 2006-09-05 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 356508
[Title] => Away-pulitika
[Summary] => SI Noel ay konsehal at si Nora ay vice mayor ng isang bayan. Sila ay magkalaban sa pulitika. Minsan, hiniling ni Noel kay Nora na aprubahan ang kanyang aplikasyon na i-monetize ang accrued leave credits nito. Subalit tinanggihan at ipinagwalang-bahala ni Nora ang aplikasyon ni Noel. Kaya galit na pumunta si Noel sa opisina ni Nora at sa harap ng maraming tao ay pinagsalitaan na "nagkukunwari ka lamang malinis at matapat. Katulad ka naman ng isang mansanas na marumi at inuuod na sa loob."
[DatePublished] => 2006-09-05 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 335773
[Title] => Cash advances ng governor
[Summary] => Si Vic ay governor ng kanilang probinsya. Naparatangan si Vic na mayroon siyang cash advances mula sa kabang bayan para sa kanyang paglalakbay sa ibang bansa kasama ang kanyang mga opisyal at ilang kaibigan. Pinabulaanan ito ni Vic sa isang radio station subalit hindi siya pinaniwalaan ng mga tao.
[DatePublished] => 2006-05-09 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[4] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 332311
[Title] => No malice
[Summary] => The element of malice in the crime of libel is presumed in every defamatory imputation.
[DatePublished] => 2006-04-20 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[5] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 280116
[Title] => Nilabag ang Bouncing Checks Law
[Summary] => UMUTANG si Gilbert ng P500,000 sa isang Rural Bank. Dahil kumpare niya ang presidente at kababayan niya halos lahat ang mga director ng banko, agad niyang nakuha ang inutang. Bilang garantiya, nagbigay siya ng sariling tsekeng walang petsa na nagkakahalaga ng P500,000 din. Nang ibinigay niya ito sa manager ng banko noong November 16, 1989, pinaalam niya rito na ang tseke ay walang sapat na pondo sapagkat P40,000 lang ang balanse niya noon sa kanyang banko. Noong December 16, 1989 kung kailan dapat bayaran na niya ang utang, humingi siya ng palugit hanggang February 16, 1990.
[DatePublished] => 2005-06-02 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[6] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 274487
[Title] => Immaterial element
[Summary] => To be liable for violation of the Bouncing Checks Law (B.P. 22), the prosecution must prove that the maker, drawer or issuer of the bad check has knowledge that he does not have sufficient funds in or credit with the drawee bank at the time he issued the check. But if the drawer or issuer of a check tells the payee from the very beginning that he does not have sufficient funds in the drawee bank, must the prosecution still prove such knowledge? And is the drawer or issuer still liable for violation of the Bouncing Checks Law?
[DatePublished] => 2005-04-19 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[7] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 261591
[Title] => Involuntary surrender
[Summary] => Voluntary surrender of an accused is a mitigating circumstance that lessens the penalty to be imposed on him if he is found guilty. To be appreciated as a mitigating circumstance however certain requisites must be proven. This is explained in the case of Lucas.
[DatePublished] => 2004-08-17 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[8] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 218901
[Title] => Kulang ang pondo sa banko
[Summary] => SI Ester ay negosyante. Upang matustusan ang patuloy na operasyon ng kanyang negosyo, madalas siyang umutang ng pera kay Thelma. Minsan, hiniling ni Thelma sa kanya na mag-isyu ng apat na tseke na may kabuuang halaga na P188,400 para sa buwan ng Setyembre hanggang Disyembre 1988 bilang kundisyon. Pumayag si Ester subalit nang ideposito na ito ni Thelma, tumalbog ang mga tseke.
[DatePublished] => 2003-08-28 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[9] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 218735
[Title] => Gist of the offense
[Summary] => Is the cause or reason for the issuance of a check material in determining liability under the bouncing checks law? This is one of the issues raised and answered in this case of Ester.
[DatePublished] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
PEOPLE G
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 594663
[Title] => Inconsequential
[Summary] => Is the cause or reason for the issuance of a check material in determining liability under the bouncing checks law? This is one of the issues raised and answered in this case of Lina.
[DatePublished] => 2010-07-20 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 356440
[Title] => Too late
[Summary] => In the crime of malversation, all that is necessary for conviction is sufficient proof that the accountable officer has received public funds, that he does not have them in his possession when demand for such funds is made and that he cannot satisfactorily explain his failure to do so. This is illustrated in this case of Danny.
[DatePublished] => 2006-09-05 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 356508
[Title] => Away-pulitika
[Summary] => SI Noel ay konsehal at si Nora ay vice mayor ng isang bayan. Sila ay magkalaban sa pulitika. Minsan, hiniling ni Noel kay Nora na aprubahan ang kanyang aplikasyon na i-monetize ang accrued leave credits nito. Subalit tinanggihan at ipinagwalang-bahala ni Nora ang aplikasyon ni Noel. Kaya galit na pumunta si Noel sa opisina ni Nora at sa harap ng maraming tao ay pinagsalitaan na "nagkukunwari ka lamang malinis at matapat. Katulad ka naman ng isang mansanas na marumi at inuuod na sa loob."
[DatePublished] => 2006-09-05 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 335773
[Title] => Cash advances ng governor
[Summary] => Si Vic ay governor ng kanilang probinsya. Naparatangan si Vic na mayroon siyang cash advances mula sa kabang bayan para sa kanyang paglalakbay sa ibang bansa kasama ang kanyang mga opisyal at ilang kaibigan. Pinabulaanan ito ni Vic sa isang radio station subalit hindi siya pinaniwalaan ng mga tao.
[DatePublished] => 2006-05-09 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[4] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 332311
[Title] => No malice
[Summary] => The element of malice in the crime of libel is presumed in every defamatory imputation.
[DatePublished] => 2006-04-20 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[5] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 280116
[Title] => Nilabag ang Bouncing Checks Law
[Summary] => UMUTANG si Gilbert ng P500,000 sa isang Rural Bank. Dahil kumpare niya ang presidente at kababayan niya halos lahat ang mga director ng banko, agad niyang nakuha ang inutang. Bilang garantiya, nagbigay siya ng sariling tsekeng walang petsa na nagkakahalaga ng P500,000 din. Nang ibinigay niya ito sa manager ng banko noong November 16, 1989, pinaalam niya rito na ang tseke ay walang sapat na pondo sapagkat P40,000 lang ang balanse niya noon sa kanyang banko. Noong December 16, 1989 kung kailan dapat bayaran na niya ang utang, humingi siya ng palugit hanggang February 16, 1990.
[DatePublished] => 2005-06-02 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[6] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 274487
[Title] => Immaterial element
[Summary] => To be liable for violation of the Bouncing Checks Law (B.P. 22), the prosecution must prove that the maker, drawer or issuer of the bad check has knowledge that he does not have sufficient funds in or credit with the drawee bank at the time he issued the check. But if the drawer or issuer of a check tells the payee from the very beginning that he does not have sufficient funds in the drawee bank, must the prosecution still prove such knowledge? And is the drawer or issuer still liable for violation of the Bouncing Checks Law?
[DatePublished] => 2005-04-19 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[7] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 261591
[Title] => Involuntary surrender
[Summary] => Voluntary surrender of an accused is a mitigating circumstance that lessens the penalty to be imposed on him if he is found guilty. To be appreciated as a mitigating circumstance however certain requisites must be proven. This is explained in the case of Lucas.
[DatePublished] => 2004-08-17 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[8] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 218901
[Title] => Kulang ang pondo sa banko
[Summary] => SI Ester ay negosyante. Upang matustusan ang patuloy na operasyon ng kanyang negosyo, madalas siyang umutang ng pera kay Thelma. Minsan, hiniling ni Thelma sa kanya na mag-isyu ng apat na tseke na may kabuuang halaga na P188,400 para sa buwan ng Setyembre hanggang Disyembre 1988 bilang kundisyon. Pumayag si Ester subalit nang ideposito na ito ni Thelma, tumalbog ang mga tseke.
[DatePublished] => 2003-08-28 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[9] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 218735
[Title] => Gist of the offense
[Summary] => Is the cause or reason for the issuance of a check material in determining liability under the bouncing checks law? This is one of the issues raised and answered in this case of Ester.
[DatePublished] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
