+ Follow OCAMPO AND CURATO Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 317250
[Title] => Sandigan asked to wrap up Erap defense
[Summary] => Prosecutors asked the Sandiganbayan yesterday to terminate the defense presentation in the plunder and perjury trial of ousted President Joseph Estrada.
Led by Special Prosecutor Dennis Villa Ignacio, the prosecutors said Estrada and his lawyers could no longer validly claim denial of due process because they have had almost three years to prepare and present their case since the last government witness testified in April 2003.
"They are simply dragging (out) the proceedings," the prosecutors said.
[DatePublished] => 2006-01-18 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 291470
[Title] => Erap lawyers bothered by Clarissa testimony
[Summary] => Deposed President Joseph Estrada wants to strike the testimony of prosecution star witness Clarissa Ocampo, a senior bank officer who had claimed that Estrada kept a secret bank account believed to used for money laundering, according to Ombudsman Simeon Marcelo.
Estrada is probably "bothered" that the Sandiganbayan anti-graft court might give weight to Ocampos testimony that he is also Jose Velarde, an alias Estrada allegedly used while keeping the bank account, Marcelo said.
[DatePublished] => 2005-08-14 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1096652
[AuthorName] => Delon Porcalla
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 289940
[Title] => Erap lawyers want Clarissa testimony nullified
[Summary] => Lawyers of deposed President Joseph Estrada asked the Sandiganbayan yesterday to nullify the testimonies of prosecution star witness Clarissa Ocampo and a bank lawyer on the ground that these were unlawfully obtained by government prosecutors.
In a six-page motion, lead defense counsel Rene Saguisag urged the justices of the special division to strike out the testimony of Ocampo and Manuel Curato, both of Equitable PCI Bank, who had declared during the former presidents impeachment trial that Estrada and the user of the bank alias Jose Velarde were one and the same.
[DatePublished] => 2005-08-05 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1096652
[AuthorName] => Delon Porcalla
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 90928
[Title] => Estrada lawyers question use of alias rap
[Summary] => Lawyers of deposed President Joseph Estrada asked the Sandiganbayan yesterday to declare illegal the prosecutors’ reference to an alias in their plunder case against the jailed leader.
In a 12-page motion, Estrada’s legal counsel Rene Saguisag said prosecutors casually assumed that the alias "Jose Velarde" referred to Estrada when they could not even cite proofs that Velarde and the former president are one and the same.
[DatePublished] => 2001-06-09 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1097133
[AuthorName] => Jose Rodel Clapano
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
[4] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 92909
[Title] => Estrada lawyers question use of alias rap
[Summary] => Lawyers of deposed President Joseph Estrada asked the Sandiganbayan yesterday to declare illegal the prosecutors’ reference to an alias in their plunder case against the jailed leader.
In a 12-page motion, Estrada’s legal counsel Rene Saguisag said prosecutors casually assumed that the alias "Jose Velarde" referred to Estrada when they could not even cite proofs that Velarde and the former president are one and the same.
[DatePublished] => 2001-06-09 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1097133
[AuthorName] => Jose Rodel Clapano
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
)
)
OCAMPO AND CURATO
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 317250
[Title] => Sandigan asked to wrap up Erap defense
[Summary] => Prosecutors asked the Sandiganbayan yesterday to terminate the defense presentation in the plunder and perjury trial of ousted President Joseph Estrada.
Led by Special Prosecutor Dennis Villa Ignacio, the prosecutors said Estrada and his lawyers could no longer validly claim denial of due process because they have had almost three years to prepare and present their case since the last government witness testified in April 2003.
"They are simply dragging (out) the proceedings," the prosecutors said.
[DatePublished] => 2006-01-18 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 291470
[Title] => Erap lawyers bothered by Clarissa testimony
[Summary] => Deposed President Joseph Estrada wants to strike the testimony of prosecution star witness Clarissa Ocampo, a senior bank officer who had claimed that Estrada kept a secret bank account believed to used for money laundering, according to Ombudsman Simeon Marcelo.
Estrada is probably "bothered" that the Sandiganbayan anti-graft court might give weight to Ocampos testimony that he is also Jose Velarde, an alias Estrada allegedly used while keeping the bank account, Marcelo said.
[DatePublished] => 2005-08-14 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1096652
[AuthorName] => Delon Porcalla
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 289940
[Title] => Erap lawyers want Clarissa testimony nullified
[Summary] => Lawyers of deposed President Joseph Estrada asked the Sandiganbayan yesterday to nullify the testimonies of prosecution star witness Clarissa Ocampo and a bank lawyer on the ground that these were unlawfully obtained by government prosecutors.
In a six-page motion, lead defense counsel Rene Saguisag urged the justices of the special division to strike out the testimony of Ocampo and Manuel Curato, both of Equitable PCI Bank, who had declared during the former presidents impeachment trial that Estrada and the user of the bank alias Jose Velarde were one and the same.
[DatePublished] => 2005-08-05 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1096652
[AuthorName] => Delon Porcalla
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 90928
[Title] => Estrada lawyers question use of alias rap
[Summary] => Lawyers of deposed President Joseph Estrada asked the Sandiganbayan yesterday to declare illegal the prosecutors’ reference to an alias in their plunder case against the jailed leader.
In a 12-page motion, Estrada’s legal counsel Rene Saguisag said prosecutors casually assumed that the alias "Jose Velarde" referred to Estrada when they could not even cite proofs that Velarde and the former president are one and the same.
[DatePublished] => 2001-06-09 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1097133
[AuthorName] => Jose Rodel Clapano
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
[4] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 92909
[Title] => Estrada lawyers question use of alias rap
[Summary] => Lawyers of deposed President Joseph Estrada asked the Sandiganbayan yesterday to declare illegal the prosecutors’ reference to an alias in their plunder case against the jailed leader.
In a 12-page motion, Estrada’s legal counsel Rene Saguisag said prosecutors casually assumed that the alias "Jose Velarde" referred to Estrada when they could not even cite proofs that Velarde and the former president are one and the same.
[DatePublished] => 2001-06-09 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1097133
[AuthorName] => Jose Rodel Clapano
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
January 18, 2006 - 12:00am