+ Follow NARDY Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 4444
[Title] => Insufficient proof
[Summary] =>
[DatePublished] => 2007-06-05 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 270670
[Title] => Optional
[Summary] => Purchase by installment is a common mode of acquiring properties particularly chattels such as cars and appliances. Also common is a provision in the contract, which usually takes the form of a Deed of Conditional Sale, that if the buyer fails to pay any of the installments when due or otherwise fail to comply with any of the terms and conditions stipulated therein, the said Deed shall automatically be rescinded and become null and void and all sums so paid by the buyer shall be forfeited and considered as rental.
[DatePublished] => 2005-03-17 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 260722
[Title] => Forbidden collateral attack
[Summary] => Forum shopping is the insti-tution of two or more actions or proceedings grounded on the same cause on the supposition that one or the other court would make a favorable disposition. If forum shopping is committed by a party, the case he filed will be dismissed. But as in any rule, there is an exception. This case of the University of the Philippines (UP) is an exception.
[DatePublished] => 2004-08-10 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 259858
[Title] => Damning waiver
[Summary] => This is another example of a case where the illegality of the arrest does not affect the subsequent proceeding that resulted in the conviction of the person illegally arrested. This is the case of Alan.
[DatePublished] => 2004-08-03 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[4] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 238596
[Title] => Inherent power
[Summary] => Has the probate court the inherent power to determine what properties, rights and credits of the deceased should be included or excluded in the inventory of the administrator? This is one of the questions resolved in this case of Tita, the duly appointed administrator of the estate of her late husband Nardy.
[DatePublished] => 2004-02-12 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[5] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 103865
[Title] => A Mere Lookout, Not A Conspirator - A Law Each Day (Keeps Trouble Away
[Summary] =>
In criminal law, conspirators and accompliances have one thing in common: they
know and agree with the criminal design. The difference, however, is that the
liability of a conspirator is collective and not individual. The act of one of
them is deemed the act of all. In the case of an accomplice, the liability is
one degree lower than that of the principal. When is a person deemed an
accomplice and when a conspirator? This is answered in this case of Nardy.
Nardy was charged with murder for the killing of Leo together with Jimmy, Eddie
and Ferdie.
[DatePublished] => 2000-02-04 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
NARDY
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 4444
[Title] => Insufficient proof
[Summary] =>
[DatePublished] => 2007-06-05 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 270670
[Title] => Optional
[Summary] => Purchase by installment is a common mode of acquiring properties particularly chattels such as cars and appliances. Also common is a provision in the contract, which usually takes the form of a Deed of Conditional Sale, that if the buyer fails to pay any of the installments when due or otherwise fail to comply with any of the terms and conditions stipulated therein, the said Deed shall automatically be rescinded and become null and void and all sums so paid by the buyer shall be forfeited and considered as rental.
[DatePublished] => 2005-03-17 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 260722
[Title] => Forbidden collateral attack
[Summary] => Forum shopping is the insti-tution of two or more actions or proceedings grounded on the same cause on the supposition that one or the other court would make a favorable disposition. If forum shopping is committed by a party, the case he filed will be dismissed. But as in any rule, there is an exception. This case of the University of the Philippines (UP) is an exception.
[DatePublished] => 2004-08-10 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 259858
[Title] => Damning waiver
[Summary] => This is another example of a case where the illegality of the arrest does not affect the subsequent proceeding that resulted in the conviction of the person illegally arrested. This is the case of Alan.
[DatePublished] => 2004-08-03 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[4] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 238596
[Title] => Inherent power
[Summary] => Has the probate court the inherent power to determine what properties, rights and credits of the deceased should be included or excluded in the inventory of the administrator? This is one of the questions resolved in this case of Tita, the duly appointed administrator of the estate of her late husband Nardy.
[DatePublished] => 2004-02-12 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[5] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 103865
[Title] => A Mere Lookout, Not A Conspirator - A Law Each Day (Keeps Trouble Away
[Summary] =>
In criminal law, conspirators and accompliances have one thing in common: they
know and agree with the criminal design. The difference, however, is that the
liability of a conspirator is collective and not individual. The act of one of
them is deemed the act of all. In the case of an accomplice, the liability is
one degree lower than that of the principal. When is a person deemed an
accomplice and when a conspirator? This is answered in this case of Nardy.
Nardy was charged with murder for the killing of Leo together with Jimmy, Eddie
and Ferdie.
[DatePublished] => 2000-02-04 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
