+ Follow MS. BENEDICTO Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 213771
[Title] => Shabu sa bagahe
[Summary] => SI Mai Li, isang negosyanteng taga-Hong Kong, ay nagpunta sa Manila para magtinda ng ready-to-wear (RTW) clothes. Sa airport, habang sinusuri ni Ms. Benedicto, isang inspector ng Customs, ang mga bagahe ni Mai Li, napansin niya na may nakaumbok dito. Iminungkahi ni Ms. Benedicto na dalhin ito sa opisina ng Customs Collector.
[DatePublished] => 2003-07-15 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 212306
[Title] => Sample testing of the whole contents
[Summary] => To be guilty of violation of the Dangerous Drugs Act (RA 6425 as amended), it must of course be established that the substance seized from an accused is a prohibited drug. But is it necessary that the entire amount of drugs confiscated be subject to laboratory tests? And is a chemical analysis an indispensable prerequisite to establish whether the substance offered in evidence is a prohibited drug? These are the questions answered in this case of Mai Li, a Hongkong business woman selling ready to wear clothes in the Philippines.
[DatePublished] => 2003-07-03 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
MS. BENEDICTO
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 213771
[Title] => Shabu sa bagahe
[Summary] => SI Mai Li, isang negosyanteng taga-Hong Kong, ay nagpunta sa Manila para magtinda ng ready-to-wear (RTW) clothes. Sa airport, habang sinusuri ni Ms. Benedicto, isang inspector ng Customs, ang mga bagahe ni Mai Li, napansin niya na may nakaumbok dito. Iminungkahi ni Ms. Benedicto na dalhin ito sa opisina ng Customs Collector.
[DatePublished] => 2003-07-15 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134393
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 212306
[Title] => Sample testing of the whole contents
[Summary] => To be guilty of violation of the Dangerous Drugs Act (RA 6425 as amended), it must of course be established that the substance seized from an accused is a prohibited drug. But is it necessary that the entire amount of drugs confiscated be subject to laboratory tests? And is a chemical analysis an indispensable prerequisite to establish whether the substance offered in evidence is a prohibited drug? These are the questions answered in this case of Mai Li, a Hongkong business woman selling ready to wear clothes in the Philippines.
[DatePublished] => 2003-07-03 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest