Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 334063
                    [Title] => Can 1017 be far behind?
                    [Summary] => First it was EO 464. The Supreme Court ruled provisions in the executive order which prohibited government and military officials from appearing at congressional hearings without the President’s consent as unconstitutional and restrictive of the people’s right to information. 


Then this week, CPR, "calibrated preemptive response," the administration’s policy in quelling rallies and protests without permits, was voided and declared unconstitutional. Could Proclamation 1017, GMA’s declaration of a state of national emergency, be far behind?  


                    [DatePublished] => 2006-04-29 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 134209
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804859
                    [AuthorName] => Domini M. Torrevillas
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

MR. HARE

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 334063
                    [Title] => Can 1017 be far behind?
                    [Summary] => First it was EO 464. The Supreme Court ruled provisions in the executive order which prohibited government and military officials from appearing at congressional hearings without the President’s consent as unconstitutional and restrictive of the people’s right to information. 


Then this week, CPR, "calibrated preemptive response," the administration’s policy in quelling rallies and protests without permits, was voided and declared unconstitutional. Could Proclamation 1017, GMA’s declaration of a state of national emergency, be far behind?  


                    [DatePublished] => 2006-04-29 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 134209
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804859
                    [AuthorName] => Domini M. Torrevillas
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Can 1017 be far behind?

By FROM THE STANDS | By Domini M. Torrevillas | April 29, 2006 - 12:00am

First it was EO 464. The Supreme Court ruled provisions in the executive order which prohibited government and military officials from appearing at congressional hearings without the President’s consent as unconstitutional...

Opinion