Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 44001
                    [Title] => PCGG to review anomalous lease of Pasig land
                    [Summary] => 
            
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-02-11 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 
                    [AuthorName] => 
                    [SectionName] => Metro
                    [SectionUrl] => metro
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 236851
                    [Title] => A more appropriate action
                    [Summary] => If there are two cases pending in court involving the same parties or such as representing the same interest in both actions, with identity of rights asserted and relief prayed for, the relief being founded on the same facts, and the judgment in either case would be conclusive on the parties (res judicata), one of them will have to be dismissed on the ground of litis pendencia. But which of the cases should be dismissed, the first or the second case filed? This is the question resolved in this case of MPLDC and ECRM.


                    [DatePublished] => 2004-01-29 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

MPLDC

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 44001
                    [Title] => PCGG to review anomalous lease of Pasig land
                    [Summary] => 
            
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-02-11 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 
                    [AuthorName] => 
                    [SectionName] => Metro
                    [SectionUrl] => metro
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 236851
                    [Title] => A more appropriate action
                    [Summary] => If there are two cases pending in court involving the same parties or such as representing the same interest in both actions, with identity of rights asserted and relief prayed for, the relief being founded on the same facts, and the judgment in either case would be conclusive on the parties (res judicata), one of them will have to be dismissed on the ground of litis pendencia. But which of the cases should be dismissed, the first or the second case filed? This is the question resolved in this case of MPLDC and ECRM.


                    [DatePublished] => 2004-01-29 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

PCGG to review anomalous lease of Pasig land

February 11, 2008 - 12:00am

Metro

A more appropriate action

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | January 29, 2004 - 12:00am

If there are two cases pending in court involving the same parties or such as representing the same interest in both actions, with identity of rights asserted and relief prayed for, the relief being founded on the...

Opinion