+ Follow LAWYER ERNEST FRANCISCO Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 298790
[Title] => SC asked to reconsider ruling junking impeachment vs GMA
[Summary] => Lawyer Ernest Francisco yesterday asked the Supreme Court to reconsider its Sept. 13 ruling junking his petition to nullify the House of Representatives vote of 158-51 that dismissed the three impeachment complaints against President Arroyo.
In an urgent, 13-page motion for reconsideration, Francisco said Rule XVIII, Section 127 of the rules adopted by the House on Oct. 27, 2004 provides that "when a bill, report or motion is adopted or lost, a member who voted with the majority may move for its reconsideration on the same or succeeding session day."
[DatePublished] => 2005-09-27 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804901
[AuthorName] => Aurea Calica
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
)
)
LAWYER ERNEST FRANCISCO
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 298790
[Title] => SC asked to reconsider ruling junking impeachment vs GMA
[Summary] => Lawyer Ernest Francisco yesterday asked the Supreme Court to reconsider its Sept. 13 ruling junking his petition to nullify the House of Representatives vote of 158-51 that dismissed the three impeachment complaints against President Arroyo.
In an urgent, 13-page motion for reconsideration, Francisco said Rule XVIII, Section 127 of the rules adopted by the House on Oct. 27, 2004 provides that "when a bill, report or motion is adopted or lost, a member who voted with the majority may move for its reconsideration on the same or succeeding session day."
[DatePublished] => 2005-09-27 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804901
[AuthorName] => Aurea Calica
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest