Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 399292
                    [Title] => Error of judgment
                    [Summary] => 
Verdicts of acquittal are usually non-reviewable or appealable. However the remedy of certiorari may be allowed if the trial court rendering the verdict acted without jurisdiction or with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction. This rule is explained in this case of Terry.
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-09-09 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 399093
                    [Title] => Letter, not spirit of the law
                    [Summary] => 
As expected, the nine (9) Supreme Court (SC) Justices who voted for Romulo Neri on the issue of “executive privilege” did not change their minds. They just stuck to and reiterated the grounds of their previous decision obviously because the Senators failed to raise new and very convincing arguments that would change their minds.
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-09-08 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133252
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1807094
                    [AuthorName] => Ana Marie Pamintuan
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

LABOR AND CRIMINAL LAWS

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 399292
                    [Title] => Error of judgment
                    [Summary] => 
Verdicts of acquittal are usually non-reviewable or appealable. However the remedy of certiorari may be allowed if the trial court rendering the verdict acted without jurisdiction or with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction. This rule is explained in this case of Terry.
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-09-09 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 399093
                    [Title] => Letter, not spirit of the law
                    [Summary] => 
As expected, the nine (9) Supreme Court (SC) Justices who voted for Romulo Neri on the issue of “executive privilege” did not change their minds. They just stuck to and reiterated the grounds of their previous decision obviously because the Senators failed to raise new and very convincing arguments that would change their minds.
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-09-08 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133252
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1807094
                    [AuthorName] => Ana Marie Pamintuan
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Error of judgment

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | September 9, 2008 - 12:00am

Verdicts of acquittal are usually non-reviewable or appealable. However the remedy of certiorari may be allowed if the trial court rendering the verdict acted without jurisdiction or with grave abuse of discretion...

Opinion

Letter, not spirit of the law

By SKETCHES | By Ana Marie Pamintuan | September 8, 2008 - 12:00am

As expected, the nine (9) Supreme Court (SC) Justices who voted for Romulo Neri on the issue of “executive privilege” did not change their minds. They just stuck to and reiterated the grounds of their...

Opinion