+ Follow JUSTICE HERMOSISIMA Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 330969
[Title] => Agonies in their gardens
[Summary] => As we noted in some detail in our last column, the Supreme Court majority in the case of Santiago vs. Comelec was trimmed from eight in the original decision to six in the resolution of a motion for reconsideration. A member of that majority joined the five dissenters in the MR. The Justices who inhibited themselves from the case rose from one to two. One Justice maintained in both the main decision and the resolution of the MR that the case was not ripe for judicial determination.
[DatePublished] => 2006-04-11 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134872
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1532076
[AuthorName] => MY VIEWPOINT By Ricardo V. Puno, Jr.
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 331145
[Title] => Agonies in their gardens
[Summary] => As we noted in some detail in our last column, the Supreme Court majority in the case of Santiago vs. Comelec was trimmed from eight in the original decision to six in the resolution of a motion for reconsideration. A member of that majority joined the five dissenters in the MR. The Justices who inhibited themselves from the case rose from one to two. One Justice maintained in both the main decision and the resolution of the MR that the case was not ripe for judicial determination.
[DatePublished] => 2006-04-11 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134872
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1532076
[AuthorName] => MY VIEWPOINT By Ricardo V. Puno, Jr.
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 331321
[Title] => Agonies in their gardens
[Summary] => As we noted in some detail in our last column, the Supreme Court majority in the case of Santiago vs. Comelec was trimmed from eight in the original decision to six in the resolution of a motion for reconsideration. A member of that majority joined the five dissenters in the MR. The Justices who inhibited themselves from the case rose from one to two. One Justice maintained in both the main decision and the resolution of the MR that the case was not ripe for judicial determination.
[DatePublished] => 2006-04-11 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134872
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1532076
[AuthorName] => MY VIEWPOINT By Ricardo V. Puno, Jr.
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
JUSTICE HERMOSISIMA
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 330969
[Title] => Agonies in their gardens
[Summary] => As we noted in some detail in our last column, the Supreme Court majority in the case of Santiago vs. Comelec was trimmed from eight in the original decision to six in the resolution of a motion for reconsideration. A member of that majority joined the five dissenters in the MR. The Justices who inhibited themselves from the case rose from one to two. One Justice maintained in both the main decision and the resolution of the MR that the case was not ripe for judicial determination.
[DatePublished] => 2006-04-11 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134872
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1532076
[AuthorName] => MY VIEWPOINT By Ricardo V. Puno, Jr.
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 331145
[Title] => Agonies in their gardens
[Summary] => As we noted in some detail in our last column, the Supreme Court majority in the case of Santiago vs. Comelec was trimmed from eight in the original decision to six in the resolution of a motion for reconsideration. A member of that majority joined the five dissenters in the MR. The Justices who inhibited themselves from the case rose from one to two. One Justice maintained in both the main decision and the resolution of the MR that the case was not ripe for judicial determination.
[DatePublished] => 2006-04-11 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134872
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1532076
[AuthorName] => MY VIEWPOINT By Ricardo V. Puno, Jr.
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 331321
[Title] => Agonies in their gardens
[Summary] => As we noted in some detail in our last column, the Supreme Court majority in the case of Santiago vs. Comelec was trimmed from eight in the original decision to six in the resolution of a motion for reconsideration. A member of that majority joined the five dissenters in the MR. The Justices who inhibited themselves from the case rose from one to two. One Justice maintained in both the main decision and the resolution of the MR that the case was not ripe for judicial determination.
[DatePublished] => 2006-04-11 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134872
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1532076
[AuthorName] => MY VIEWPOINT By Ricardo V. Puno, Jr.
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
