^
+ Follow JAMES AND LOVELY-ANN IMBONG Tag
Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 924067
                    [Title] => SC asked to lift TRO on RH law
                    [Summary] => 

The Supreme Court (SC) was asked yesterday to lift its order temporarily stopping the government from implementing the controversial Republic Act No. 10354 or Reproductive Health (RH) law.

[DatePublished] => 2013-03-26 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 0 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1096875 [AuthorName] => Edu Punay [SectionName] => Headlines [SectionUrl] => headlines [URL] => http://imageshack.us/a/img23/8853/gen4h.jpg ) [1] => Array ( [ArticleID] => 894895 [Title] => No immediate SC order on RH law petitions [Summary] =>

The Supreme Court (SC) deferred acting yesterday on a petition seeking to stop the implementation of the controversial Republic Act 10354 or the Reproductive Health (RH) law.

[DatePublished] => 2013-01-09 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 0 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1096875 [AuthorName] => Edu Punay [SectionName] => Headlines [SectionUrl] => headlines [URL] => http://imageshack.us/a/img16/7606/reproductivehealth.jpg ) [2] => Array ( [ArticleID] => 894129 [Title] => Gut issues [Summary] =>

As expected, the issue on the validity of the RH law has been brought to the Supreme Court (SC).

[DatePublished] => 2013-01-07 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 133340 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1804883 [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison [SectionName] => Opinion [SectionUrl] => opinion [URL] => ) ) )
JAMES AND LOVELY-ANN IMBONG
Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 924067
                    [Title] => SC asked to lift TRO on RH law
                    [Summary] => 

The Supreme Court (SC) was asked yesterday to lift its order temporarily stopping the government from implementing the controversial Republic Act No. 10354 or Reproductive Health (RH) law.

[DatePublished] => 2013-03-26 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 0 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1096875 [AuthorName] => Edu Punay [SectionName] => Headlines [SectionUrl] => headlines [URL] => http://imageshack.us/a/img23/8853/gen4h.jpg ) [1] => Array ( [ArticleID] => 894895 [Title] => No immediate SC order on RH law petitions [Summary] =>

The Supreme Court (SC) deferred acting yesterday on a petition seeking to stop the implementation of the controversial Republic Act 10354 or the Reproductive Health (RH) law.

[DatePublished] => 2013-01-09 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 0 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1096875 [AuthorName] => Edu Punay [SectionName] => Headlines [SectionUrl] => headlines [URL] => http://imageshack.us/a/img16/7606/reproductivehealth.jpg ) [2] => Array ( [ArticleID] => 894129 [Title] => Gut issues [Summary] =>

As expected, the issue on the validity of the RH law has been brought to the Supreme Court (SC).

[DatePublished] => 2013-01-07 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 133340 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1804883 [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison [SectionName] => Opinion [SectionUrl] => opinion [URL] => ) ) )
abtest
Are you sure you want to log out?
X
Login

Philstar.com is one of the most vibrant, opinionated, discerning communities of readers on cyberspace. With your meaningful insights, help shape the stories that can shape the country. Sign up now!

Get Updated:

Signup for the News Round now

FORGOT PASSWORD?
SIGN IN
or sign in with