+ Follow HUNTINGTON STEEL PRODUCTS INC Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 290974
[Title] => Ano ang certificate of non-forum shopping?
[Summary] => MAHIGPIT na pinagbabawal ng batas ang pagsasampa ng kaso kung walang certificate of non-forum shopping. Kung wala nito idi-dismiss ang kaso.
Sa kabila ng nasabing batas, nag-file sina Orly ng reklamo sa NLRC laban sa kompanyang pinapasukan nila, ang HSPI at EMW, ng illegal dismissal with damages na walang kalakip na nasabing sertipiko. Itoy dahil na rin sa nag-fill-up lang sila ng complaint form ng NLRC na wala namang sertipikong nakalakip. Noon lang nag-file sila ng position paper saka nila nilakip ang nasabing sertipiko.
[DatePublished] => 2005-08-11 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134390
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 278888
[Title] => Excusable omission
[Summary] => To prevent forum shopping, or the multiple filing of complaints and petitions, the Rules of Court (Section 5, Rule 7) require that every complaint, petition, application or other initiatory pleading shall be accompanied by a "certificate of non forum shopping". This rule is mandatory such that its violation shall be a cause for the dismissal of said complaint. But is the rule mandatory even in labor cases? This is the question resolved in this case of Orly and eleven of his co-workers in a steel manufacturing company (HSPI).
[DatePublished] => 2005-05-24 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
HUNTINGTON STEEL PRODUCTS INC
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 290974
[Title] => Ano ang certificate of non-forum shopping?
[Summary] => MAHIGPIT na pinagbabawal ng batas ang pagsasampa ng kaso kung walang certificate of non-forum shopping. Kung wala nito idi-dismiss ang kaso.
Sa kabila ng nasabing batas, nag-file sina Orly ng reklamo sa NLRC laban sa kompanyang pinapasukan nila, ang HSPI at EMW, ng illegal dismissal with damages na walang kalakip na nasabing sertipiko. Itoy dahil na rin sa nag-fill-up lang sila ng complaint form ng NLRC na wala namang sertipikong nakalakip. Noon lang nag-file sila ng position paper saka nila nilakip ang nasabing sertipiko.
[DatePublished] => 2005-08-11 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134390
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
[SectionUrl] => opinyon
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 278888
[Title] => Excusable omission
[Summary] => To prevent forum shopping, or the multiple filing of complaints and petitions, the Rules of Court (Section 5, Rule 7) require that every complaint, petition, application or other initiatory pleading shall be accompanied by a "certificate of non forum shopping". This rule is mandatory such that its violation shall be a cause for the dismissal of said complaint. But is the rule mandatory even in labor cases? This is the question resolved in this case of Orly and eleven of his co-workers in a steel manufacturing company (HSPI).
[DatePublished] => 2005-05-24 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest