Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 641274
                    [Title] => Negligent but not ignorant
                    [Summary] => 
To be liable for gross ignorance of the law, a judge must be shown, among others, to have “ignored, contradicted or failed to apply settled law and jurisprudence”.
                    [DatePublished] => 2010-12-22 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

HOWEVER JUDGE

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 641274
                    [Title] => Negligent but not ignorant
                    [Summary] => 
To be liable for gross ignorance of the law, a judge must be shown, among others, to have “ignored, contradicted or failed to apply settled law and jurisprudence”.
                    [DatePublished] => 2010-12-22 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Negligent but not ignorant

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | December 22, 2010 - 12:00am

To be liable for gross ignorance of the law, a judge must be shown, among others, to have “ignored, contradicted or failed to apply settled law and jurisprudence”.

Opinion