Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 301379
                    [Title] => Collateral attack
                    [Summary] => This is an example of a case elucidating the principle that a Torrens Title is indefeasible; that it can be attacked only for fraud within one year from the issuance of the decree of registration in a direct, not a collateral proceeding.


                    [DatePublished] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

HIDDEN VIEW I

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 301379
                    [Title] => Collateral attack
                    [Summary] => This is an example of a case elucidating the principle that a Torrens Title is indefeasible; that it can be attacked only for fraud within one year from the issuance of the decree of registration in a direct, not a collateral proceeding.


                    [DatePublished] => 2005-10-12 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Collateral attack

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | October 12, 2005 - 12:00am

This is an example of a case elucidating the principle that a Torrens Title is indefeasible; that it can be attacked only for fraud within one year from the issuance of the decree of registration in a direct, not...

Opinion