+ Follow HENCE VIRGILIO Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 366436
[Title] => Flawed argument
[Summary] =>
In certiorari proceedings under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court like the petition filed by "Sigaw" and Ulap, questions of facts are generally not permitted, the inquiry being limited essentially to whether or not the respondent tribunal (Comelec) had acted without or in excess of jurisdiction or with grave abuse of discretion.
[DatePublished] => 2006-11-01 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
HENCE VIRGILIO
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 366436
[Title] => Flawed argument
[Summary] =>
In certiorari proceedings under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court like the petition filed by "Sigaw" and Ulap, questions of facts are generally not permitted, the inquiry being limited essentially to whether or not the respondent tribunal (Comelec) had acted without or in excess of jurisdiction or with grave abuse of discretion.
[DatePublished] => 2006-11-01 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest