Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 359385
                    [Title] => Celluloid style
                    [Summary] => It’s a chicken-or-egg kind of debate: with fashion having become an integral element in film, both on the big and small screens, the existential question of what cheapens which, or if one is inclined to be charitable about it, what glamorizes which, gets brought up. 


                    [DatePublished] => 2006-09-22 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1742900
                    [AuthorName] => September Mahino
                    [SectionName] => Young Star
                    [SectionUrl] => young-star
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

EDITH HEADS

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 359385
                    [Title] => Celluloid style
                    [Summary] => It’s a chicken-or-egg kind of debate: with fashion having become an integral element in film, both on the big and small screens, the existential question of what cheapens which, or if one is inclined to be charitable about it, what glamorizes which, gets brought up. 


                    [DatePublished] => 2006-09-22 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1742900
                    [AuthorName] => September Mahino
                    [SectionName] => Young Star
                    [SectionUrl] => young-star
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Celluloid style

By September Mahino | September 22, 2006 - 12:00am

It’s a chicken-or-egg kind of debate: with fashion having become an integral element in film, both on the big and small screens, the existential question of what cheapens which, or if one is inclined to be charitable...

Young Star