Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 424528
                    [Title] => Unfair
                    [Summary] => 
Happily, the Judicial and Bar Council decided to revisit its earlier decision to exclude from the list of potential Supreme Court justices three distinguished lawyers for reasons that may not only be unfair but also unconstitutional.
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-12-18 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 134157
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804783
                    [AuthorName] => Alex Magno
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

DEVANADERA AND BUNAG

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 424528
                    [Title] => Unfair
                    [Summary] => 
Happily, the Judicial and Bar Council decided to revisit its earlier decision to exclude from the list of potential Supreme Court justices three distinguished lawyers for reasons that may not only be unfair but also unconstitutional.
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-12-18 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 134157
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804783
                    [AuthorName] => Alex Magno
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Unfair

By FIRST PERSON | By Alex Magno | December 18, 2008 - 12:00am

Happily, the Judicial and Bar Council decided to revisit its earlier decision to exclude from the list of potential Supreme Court justices three distinguished lawyers for reasons that may not only be unfair but also...

Opinion