Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 416586
                    [Title] => Initially right but ultimately wrong
                    [Summary] => This is another case of an ejectment suit raising two issues on who are bound by the decision and who has the better right of possession over the land.
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-11-20 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

DELY AND BADONG

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 416586
                    [Title] => Initially right but ultimately wrong
                    [Summary] => This is another case of an ejectment suit raising two issues on who are bound by the decision and who has the better right of possession over the land.
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-11-20 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Initially right but ultimately wrong

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | November 20, 2008 - 12:00am

This is another case of an ejectment suit raising two issues on who are bound by the decision and who has the better right of possession over the land.

Opinion