Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 513656
                    [Title] => Plain view
                    [Summary] => 
In yesterday’s case (Abelita III vs. Doria and Ramirez, G.R. 170672, August 14, 2009), one of the causes of action relied upon by the Judge (Abe) who filed the case for damages against the police officers (Dario and Romy) is the violation of his right to be secure in one’s person, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
                    [DatePublished] => 2009-10-14 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 513326
                    [Title] => Valid suspicion
                    [Summary] => 
This is another case on the legality of a warrantless arrest of an offender that has just committed an offense.
                    [DatePublished] => 2009-10-13 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

DARIO AND ROMY

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 513656
                    [Title] => Plain view
                    [Summary] => 
In yesterday’s case (Abelita III vs. Doria and Ramirez, G.R. 170672, August 14, 2009), one of the causes of action relied upon by the Judge (Abe) who filed the case for damages against the police officers (Dario and Romy) is the violation of his right to be secure in one’s person, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
                    [DatePublished] => 2009-10-14 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 513326
                    [Title] => Valid suspicion
                    [Summary] => 
This is another case on the legality of a warrantless arrest of an offender that has just committed an offense.
                    [DatePublished] => 2009-10-13 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Plain view

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | October 14, 2009 - 12:00am

In yesterday’s case (Abelita III vs. Doria and Ramirez, G.R. 170672, August 14, 2009), one of the causes of action relied upon by the Judge (Abe) who filed the case for damages against the police officers (Dario...

Opinion

Valid suspicion

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | October 13, 2009 - 12:00am

This is another case on the legality of a warrantless arrest of an offender that has just committed an offense.

Opinion