^
+ Follow CTDC Tag
Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1356
                    [Title] => PBB evictee Dionne Monsanto: I had fun
                    [Summary] => 
            
                    [DatePublished] => 2007-05-22 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 
                    [AuthorName] => 
                    [SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
                    [SectionUrl] => opinyon
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 394103
                    [Title] => Subdibisyon na walang ‘open space’
                    [Summary] => 





NOONG 1979, naghain ng reklamo sa National Housing Authority (NHA) ang PHVA, isang homeowners association sa pangunguna ni Gerry laban sa PSC, owner-developer ng kanilang village. Isa sa mga paglabag na inireklamo ng PHVA laban sa PSC ay ang hindi paglalaan nito ng isang "open space" sa naturang subdivision. Matapos magsagawa ng isang ocular inspection ang NHA, napatunayan nitong wala ngang "open space" ang subdivision subalit may nakita itong isang bakanteng lote (Block 40) na may 22,916 square meters.
                    [DatePublished] => 2007-04-12 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 134393
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
                    [SectionUrl] => opinyon
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [2] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 393706
                    [Title] => Day in court
                    [Summary] => 









A judgment cannot bind strangers to a case. They must have their day in court. The case of Gerry and Cely illustrates this principle. Their case also explains the meaning of "successor-in-interest".

[DatePublished] => 2007-04-10 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 133340 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1804883 [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison [SectionName] => Opinion [SectionUrl] => opinion [URL] => ) ) )
CTDC
Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1356
                    [Title] => PBB evictee Dionne Monsanto: I had fun
                    [Summary] => 
            
                    [DatePublished] => 2007-05-22 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133272
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 
                    [AuthorName] => 
                    [SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
                    [SectionUrl] => opinyon
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 394103
                    [Title] => Subdibisyon na walang ‘open space’
                    [Summary] => 





NOONG 1979, naghain ng reklamo sa National Housing Authority (NHA) ang PHVA, isang homeowners association sa pangunguna ni Gerry laban sa PSC, owner-developer ng kanilang village. Isa sa mga paglabag na inireklamo ng PHVA laban sa PSC ay ang hindi paglalaan nito ng isang "open space" sa naturang subdivision. Matapos magsagawa ng isang ocular inspection ang NHA, napatunayan nitong wala ngang "open space" ang subdivision subalit may nakita itong isang bakanteng lote (Block 40) na may 22,916 square meters.
                    [DatePublished] => 2007-04-12 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 134393
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => PSN Opinyon
                    [SectionUrl] => opinyon
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [2] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 393706
                    [Title] => Day in court
                    [Summary] => 









A judgment cannot bind strangers to a case. They must have their day in court. The case of Gerry and Cely illustrates this principle. Their case also explains the meaning of "successor-in-interest".

[DatePublished] => 2007-04-10 00:00:00 [ColumnID] => 133340 [Focus] => 0 [AuthorID] => 1804883 [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison [SectionName] => Opinion [SectionUrl] => opinion [URL] => ) ) )
abtest
Are you sure you want to log out?
X
Login

Philstar.com is one of the most vibrant, opinionated, discerning communities of readers on cyberspace. With your meaningful insights, help shape the stories that can shape the country. Sign up now!

Get Updated:

Signup for the News Round now

FORGOT PASSWORD?
SIGN IN
or sign in with