+ Follow CORPORATE COMPENSATION CIRCULAR NO Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 602845
[Title] => Appeals court nullifies RTC ruling hiking salaries of airport workers
[Summary] => The Court of Appeals (CA) has nullified a 2006 ruling of a Pasay City regional trial court ordering the Manila International Airport Authority to integrate the cost of living allowance (COLA) and amelioration allowance into the basic salaries of the more than 1,500 airport employees in the country based on a circular of the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) in 1999.
[DatePublished] => 2010-08-16 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1096875
[AuthorName] => Edu Punay
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 296061
[Title] => SC junks COA ruling denying allowances to PPA employees
[Summary] => The Supreme Court reversed a decision of the Commission on Audit denying cost of living and amelioration allowances to employees of the Philippine Ports Authority hired after July 1, 1989.
The SC decision came after the PPA employees filed a petition for certiorari assailing COA's May 27, 2003 decision and October 16, 2003 resolution that denied their petitions for "lack of merit."
[DatePublished] => 2005-09-10 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Cebu News
[SectionUrl] => cebu-news
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 210816
[Title] => Stubborn refusal to implement the law
[Summary] => Since the enactment of the Salary Standardization Law (RA 6758) on July 1, 1989, there is one controversy that continues to plague some government owned or controlled corporations (GOCCs) despite the numerous Supreme Court rulings interpreting Section 12 and 17 of said Act on the non-diminution of the salaries and fringe benefits of incumbent employees (PPA vs. COA G.R.10073, October 10,1992;PITC vs. COA, G.R.132593, June 25,1999; De Jesus vs. COA,G.R.109023, August 12,1998; NTA vs. COA 119385, Aug.5,1999; Cruz et al. vs. COA, G.R. 134740, Oct. 23, 2001).
[DatePublished] => 2003-06-20 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 202657
[Title] => Inequity at PCIC
[Summary] => Any public official or employee is called upon to exercise his power and perform his duties not only in a legal and just manner but also in an efficient and proper way. This is a basic precept in public service arising out of the principle of accountability of public officers who are called to serve with "utmost responsibility, integrity, loyalty and efficiency". The Constitution itself has set these high standards. Admittedly, they sound and look good – but only on paper.
[DatePublished] => 2003-04-14 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
CORPORATE COMPENSATION CIRCULAR NO
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 602845
[Title] => Appeals court nullifies RTC ruling hiking salaries of airport workers
[Summary] => The Court of Appeals (CA) has nullified a 2006 ruling of a Pasay City regional trial court ordering the Manila International Airport Authority to integrate the cost of living allowance (COLA) and amelioration allowance into the basic salaries of the more than 1,500 airport employees in the country based on a circular of the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) in 1999.
[DatePublished] => 2010-08-16 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1096875
[AuthorName] => Edu Punay
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 296061
[Title] => SC junks COA ruling denying allowances to PPA employees
[Summary] => The Supreme Court reversed a decision of the Commission on Audit denying cost of living and amelioration allowances to employees of the Philippine Ports Authority hired after July 1, 1989.
The SC decision came after the PPA employees filed a petition for certiorari assailing COA's May 27, 2003 decision and October 16, 2003 resolution that denied their petitions for "lack of merit."
[DatePublished] => 2005-09-10 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Cebu News
[SectionUrl] => cebu-news
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 210816
[Title] => Stubborn refusal to implement the law
[Summary] => Since the enactment of the Salary Standardization Law (RA 6758) on July 1, 1989, there is one controversy that continues to plague some government owned or controlled corporations (GOCCs) despite the numerous Supreme Court rulings interpreting Section 12 and 17 of said Act on the non-diminution of the salaries and fringe benefits of incumbent employees (PPA vs. COA G.R.10073, October 10,1992;PITC vs. COA, G.R.132593, June 25,1999; De Jesus vs. COA,G.R.109023, August 12,1998; NTA vs. COA 119385, Aug.5,1999; Cruz et al. vs. COA, G.R. 134740, Oct. 23, 2001).
[DatePublished] => 2003-06-20 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 202657
[Title] => Inequity at PCIC
[Summary] => Any public official or employee is called upon to exercise his power and perform his duties not only in a legal and just manner but also in an efficient and proper way. This is a basic precept in public service arising out of the principle of accountability of public officers who are called to serve with "utmost responsibility, integrity, loyalty and efficiency". The Constitution itself has set these high standards. Admittedly, they sound and look good – but only on paper.
[DatePublished] => 2003-04-14 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
September 10, 2005 - 12:00am
