+ Follow CONSA Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 213485
[Title] => Who will explain? / No alternative to Charter Change Now
[Summary] => Friday’s headline on SWS giving 70 percent for con-con and 72 percent for presidential system does not tell the whole story. The findings are a month old having been conducted from May 28 to June 14. This was not released. Dr. Jose Abueva, a staunch advocate for Con-con sits on the board of SWS. Dr. Mahar Mangahas, on the other hand was aware that advocates of Consa had commissioned a survey from June 26 to July 3.
[DatePublished] => 2003-07-13 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134199
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804784
[AuthorName] => Carmen N. Pedrosa
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 206042
[Title] => Waiting for a miracle
[Summary] => The other night when Speaker Jose de Venecia Jr. dropped by The STAR, representatives of the Iglesia Ni Cristo and El Shaddai had just told the Senate committee handling constitutional amendments that they preferred to rewrite the Charter through a constitutional convention. A statement from an arm of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines also said the time is not yet ripe for Charter change or Cha-cha.
The irrepressible De Venecia, however, seemed unfazed.
[DatePublished] => 2003-05-14 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133252
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1807094
[AuthorName] => Ana Marie Pamintuan
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 204920
[Title] => Consa emerging as best option
[Summary] => Nineteen of the 23 senators are said to favor constitutional changes. So do 218 of 231 congressmen. The only bone of contention is how to do it: By themselves through a constituent assembly (Consa), or by election of delegates to a constitutional convention (Con-con). Timing and economy dictate that they opt for the first - and now.
[DatePublished] => 2003-05-05 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134276
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1805283
[AuthorName] => Jarius Bondoc
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 204812
[Title] => Angara: Constituent assembly preferred in Cha-cha
[Summary] => Convening Congress into a constituent assembly (Consa) to propose constitutional amendments is looming as the preferred mode for Cha-cha (Charter change).
Sen. Edgardo Angara, chairman of the Senate committee on constitutional amendments and electoral reforms, said yesterday Congress would most likely adopt Consa as the method for effecting constitutional reforms.
[DatePublished] => 2003-05-04 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1097047
[AuthorName] => Jess Diaz
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
)
)
CONSA
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 213485
[Title] => Who will explain? / No alternative to Charter Change Now
[Summary] => Friday’s headline on SWS giving 70 percent for con-con and 72 percent for presidential system does not tell the whole story. The findings are a month old having been conducted from May 28 to June 14. This was not released. Dr. Jose Abueva, a staunch advocate for Con-con sits on the board of SWS. Dr. Mahar Mangahas, on the other hand was aware that advocates of Consa had commissioned a survey from June 26 to July 3.
[DatePublished] => 2003-07-13 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134199
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804784
[AuthorName] => Carmen N. Pedrosa
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 206042
[Title] => Waiting for a miracle
[Summary] => The other night when Speaker Jose de Venecia Jr. dropped by The STAR, representatives of the Iglesia Ni Cristo and El Shaddai had just told the Senate committee handling constitutional amendments that they preferred to rewrite the Charter through a constitutional convention. A statement from an arm of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines also said the time is not yet ripe for Charter change or Cha-cha.
The irrepressible De Venecia, however, seemed unfazed.
[DatePublished] => 2003-05-14 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133252
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1807094
[AuthorName] => Ana Marie Pamintuan
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[2] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 204920
[Title] => Consa emerging as best option
[Summary] => Nineteen of the 23 senators are said to favor constitutional changes. So do 218 of 231 congressmen. The only bone of contention is how to do it: By themselves through a constituent assembly (Consa), or by election of delegates to a constitutional convention (Con-con). Timing and economy dictate that they opt for the first - and now.
[DatePublished] => 2003-05-05 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134276
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1805283
[AuthorName] => Jarius Bondoc
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[3] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 204812
[Title] => Angara: Constituent assembly preferred in Cha-cha
[Summary] => Convening Congress into a constituent assembly (Consa) to propose constitutional amendments is looming as the preferred mode for Cha-cha (Charter change).
Sen. Edgardo Angara, chairman of the Senate committee on constitutional amendments and electoral reforms, said yesterday Congress would most likely adopt Consa as the method for effecting constitutional reforms.
[DatePublished] => 2003-05-04 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1097047
[AuthorName] => Jess Diaz
[SectionName] => Headlines
[SectionUrl] => headlines
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
