Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 904233
                    [Title] => How the 200 nautical miles limit evolved
                    [Summary] => 
I spoke with a diplomat recently who said that bringing the South China Sea conflict issue for arbitration was good.

                    [DatePublished] => 2013-02-03 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 134199
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804784
                    [AuthorName] => Carmen N. Pedrosa
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

CLARITA LAPUZ

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 904233
                    [Title] => How the 200 nautical miles limit evolved
                    [Summary] => 
I spoke with a diplomat recently who said that bringing the South China Sea conflict issue for arbitration was good.

                    [DatePublished] => 2013-02-03 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 134199
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804784
                    [AuthorName] => Carmen N. Pedrosa
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

How the 200 nautical miles limit evolved

By FROM A DISTANCE | By Carmen N. Pedrosa | February 3, 2013 - 12:00am

I spoke with a diplomat recently who said that bringing the South China Sea conflict issue for arbitration was good.

Opinion