Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 673166
                    [Title] => Doomed from inception (Part 2)
                    [Summary] => 
The RTC declared the marriage of Chit and Alan void because said marriage from “its inception has a congenital infirmity termed ‘psychological incapacity’ which pertains to the inability of the parties to effectively function emotionally, intellectually and socially towards each other in relation to their essential duties to mutually observe love, fidelity and respect as well as to mutually render help and support”.
                    [DatePublished] => 2011-04-06 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 672772
                    [Title] => Doomed from inception
                    [Summary] => 
This case is about the marriage of Chit and Alan. The main issue here is whether the lack of personal examination or interview of the spouse allegedly suffering from psychological incapacity, by the clinical psychologists and psychiatrist, invalidates their testimonies and render their reports, hearsay.
                    [DatePublished] => 2011-04-05 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

CHIT AND ALAN

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 673166
                    [Title] => Doomed from inception (Part 2)
                    [Summary] => 
The RTC declared the marriage of Chit and Alan void because said marriage from “its inception has a congenital infirmity termed ‘psychological incapacity’ which pertains to the inability of the parties to effectively function emotionally, intellectually and socially towards each other in relation to their essential duties to mutually observe love, fidelity and respect as well as to mutually render help and support”.
                    [DatePublished] => 2011-04-06 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 672772
                    [Title] => Doomed from inception
                    [Summary] => 
This case is about the marriage of Chit and Alan. The main issue here is whether the lack of personal examination or interview of the spouse allegedly suffering from psychological incapacity, by the clinical psychologists and psychiatrist, invalidates their testimonies and render their reports, hearsay.
                    [DatePublished] => 2011-04-05 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Doomed from inception (Part 2)

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | April 6, 2011 - 12:00am

The RTC declared the marriage of Chit and Alan void because said marriage from “its inception has a congenital infirmity termed ‘psychological incapacity’ which pertains to the inability of the...

Opinion

Doomed from inception

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | April 5, 2011 - 12:00am

This case is about the marriage of Chit and Alan. The main issue here is whether the lack of personal examination or interview of the spouse allegedly suffering from psychological incapacity, by the clinical psychologists...

Opinion