Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 407836
                    [Title] => Talking to the wrong party
                    [Summary] => It is well and good that the Supreme Court (SC) decided to rule on the validity of the Memorandum of Agreement on the ...
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-10-17 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

CHICO-NAZARIO AND LEONARDO

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 407836
                    [Title] => Talking to the wrong party
                    [Summary] => It is well and good that the Supreme Court (SC) decided to rule on the validity of the Memorandum of Agreement on the ...
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-10-17 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Talking to the wrong party

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | October 17, 2008 - 12:00am

It is well and good that the Supreme Court (SC) decided to rule on the validity of the Memorandum of Agreement on the ...

Opinion