+ Follow CAMILO L Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 482032
[Title] => Milking sequestered companies made easy
[Summary] => No To Computers: Just as we are poised to plunge into full automation for the 2010 national elections, the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany ruled last March 3 that the use of voting computers is unconstitutional (to them).
[DatePublished] => 2009-06-30 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 135304
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804858
[AuthorName] => Federico D. Pascual Jr.
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 359679
[Title] => Democracys last bastion
[Summary] =>
Never has our Supreme Court been busier than during these times. For the month of September alone, a total of ten cases have been set for oral arguments. As far as I know, cases are not usually set for oral arguments. Instead the parties are just required to submit their respective memoranda. But for these ten cases, oral arguments have been called obviously because our Justices found them to be of transcendental importance affecting the public at large and thus have to be resolved urgently.
[DatePublished] => 2006-09-25 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
CAMILO L
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 482032
[Title] => Milking sequestered companies made easy
[Summary] => No To Computers: Just as we are poised to plunge into full automation for the 2010 national elections, the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany ruled last March 3 that the use of voting computers is unconstitutional (to them).
[DatePublished] => 2009-06-30 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 135304
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804858
[AuthorName] => Federico D. Pascual Jr.
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 359679
[Title] => Democracys last bastion
[Summary] =>
Never has our Supreme Court been busier than during these times. For the month of September alone, a total of ten cases have been set for oral arguments. As far as I know, cases are not usually set for oral arguments. Instead the parties are just required to submit their respective memoranda. But for these ten cases, oral arguments have been called obviously because our Justices found them to be of transcendental importance affecting the public at large and thus have to be resolved urgently.
[DatePublished] => 2006-09-25 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133340
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804883
[AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest