+ Follow BOTH PANGANIBAN AND PUNO Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 329735
[Title] => Revisit
[Summary] => The snowballing signature campaign to amend the Constitution has reason to be optimistic the Supreme Court might choose to revisit its earlier ruling on the Santiago vs. Comelec case.
The case arose out of a constitutional question posed the Court regarding a popular initiative led by the group Pirma. The question revolved around whether the existing law on initiative and referendum covers a popular initiative to amend the Constitution.
[DatePublished] => 2006-04-04 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134157
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804783
[AuthorName] => Alex Magno
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
BOTH PANGANIBAN AND PUNO
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 329735
[Title] => Revisit
[Summary] => The snowballing signature campaign to amend the Constitution has reason to be optimistic the Supreme Court might choose to revisit its earlier ruling on the Santiago vs. Comelec case.
The case arose out of a constitutional question posed the Court regarding a popular initiative led by the group Pirma. The question revolved around whether the existing law on initiative and referendum covers a popular initiative to amend the Constitution.
[DatePublished] => 2006-04-04 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 134157
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1804783
[AuthorName] => Alex Magno
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest