Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 417990
                    [Title] => Gravely mistaken (Part II)
                    [Summary] => 
The following is the continuation of the response of the members of different international academic institutions predominantly in the fields of law and theology, to the position paper of the Ateneo Professors regarding HB 5043.
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-11-25 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 417870
                    [Title] => Gravely mistaken (Part I)
                    [Summary] => In the position paper drafted by 14 Ateneo Professors on HB 5043, they stated that the bill adheres “to core principles of Catholic social teaching: the sanctity of human life, the dignity of the human person, the preferential option for the poor and vulnerable integral human development, human rights and the primacy of conscience”.
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-11-24 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [2] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 411404
                    [Title] => Crucial questions on the RH bill
                    [Summary] => House Bill 5043 or The Reproductive Health, Responsible Parenthood and Population Development Act of 2008 (RH bill) is ...
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-10-31 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

ATENEO PROFESSORS

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 417990
                    [Title] => Gravely mistaken (Part II)
                    [Summary] => 
The following is the continuation of the response of the members of different international academic institutions predominantly in the fields of law and theology, to the position paper of the Ateneo Professors regarding HB 5043.
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-11-25 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [1] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 417870
                    [Title] => Gravely mistaken (Part I)
                    [Summary] => In the position paper drafted by 14 Ateneo Professors on HB 5043, they stated that the bill adheres “to core principles of Catholic social teaching: the sanctity of human life, the dignity of the human person, the preferential option for the poor and vulnerable integral human development, human rights and the primacy of conscience”.
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-11-24 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

            [2] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 411404
                    [Title] => Crucial questions on the RH bill
                    [Summary] => House Bill 5043 or The Reproductive Health, Responsible Parenthood and Population Development Act of 2008 (RH bill) is ...
                    [DatePublished] => 2008-10-31 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Gravely mistaken (Part II)

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | November 25, 2008 - 12:00am

The following is the continuation of the response of the members of different international academic institutions predominantly in the fields of law and theology, to the position paper of the Ateneo Professors regarding...

Opinion

Gravely mistaken (Part I)

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | November 24, 2008 - 12:00am

In the position paper drafted by 14 Ateneo Professors on HB 5043, they stated that the bill adheres “to core principles of Catholic social teaching: the sanctity of human life, the dignity of the human person,...

Opinion

Crucial questions on the RH bill

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | October 31, 2008 - 12:00am

House Bill 5043 or The Reproductive Health, Responsible Parenthood and Population Development Act of 2008 (RH bill) is ...

Opinion