Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 274487
                    [Title] => Immaterial element
                    [Summary] => To be liable for violation of the Bouncing Checks Law (B.P. 22), the prosecution must prove that the maker, drawer or issuer of the bad check has knowledge that he does not have sufficient funds in or credit with the drawee bank at the time he issued the check. But if the drawer or issuer of a check tells the payee from the very beginning that he does not have sufficient funds in the drawee bank, must the prosecution still prove such knowledge? And is the drawer or issuer still liable for violation of the Bouncing Checks Law?
                    [DatePublished] => 2005-04-19 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

ASSOCIATED BANK TARLAC BRANCH

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 274487
                    [Title] => Immaterial element
                    [Summary] => To be liable for violation of the Bouncing Checks Law (B.P. 22), the prosecution must prove that the maker, drawer or issuer of the bad check has knowledge that he does not have sufficient funds in or credit with the drawee bank at the time he issued the check. But if the drawer or issuer of a check tells the payee from the very beginning that he does not have sufficient funds in the drawee bank, must the prosecution still prove such knowledge? And is the drawer or issuer still liable for violation of the Bouncing Checks Law?
                    [DatePublished] => 2005-04-19 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Immaterial element

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | April 19, 2005 - 12:00am

To be liable for violation of the Bouncing Checks Law (B.P. 22), the prosecution must prove that the maker, drawer or issuer of the bad check has knowledge that he does not have sufficient funds in or credit with...

Opinion