Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1281614
                    [Title] => Provisional ruling
                    [Summary] => 
As a rule, unlawful detainer or ejectment cases are resolved on the issue of possession or who has the better right to possess, and not who owns the property. But in this particular case between Albert and Billy, the issue of ownership is also resolved.

                    [DatePublished] => 2014-01-22 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133342
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

ARK SUGAR REFINERY

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1281614
                    [Title] => Provisional ruling
                    [Summary] => 
As a rule, unlawful detainer or ejectment cases are resolved on the issue of possession or who has the better right to possess, and not who owns the property. But in this particular case between Albert and Billy, the issue of ownership is also resolved.

                    [DatePublished] => 2014-01-22 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133342
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Provisional ruling

By Jose C. Sison | January 22, 2014 - 12:00am

As a rule, unlawful detainer or ejectment cases are resolved on the issue of possession or who has the better right to possess, and not who owns the property. But in this particular case between Albert and Billy,...

Opinion