+ Follow ARIEL RABE Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 102090
[Title] => Conditioning minds for slick acquittal - GOTCHA by Jarius Bondoc
[Summary] => Theyll do anything to quash Chavit Singsons testimony in Joseph Estradas impeachment trial. On opening day, defense lawyers accused the whistle-blower of concocting the jueteng bribery story. When his time came to stand as witness, they tried to stop his direct examination by a private lawyer. Simultaneously at the other end of town, Estradas gofers at the House of Representatives assailed the congressmen-prosecutors use of private counsel. When these didnt work, senator-judges themselves took turns cross-examining Singson.
[DatePublished] => 2000-12-16 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 102918
[Title] => Would you go to jail for Erap? - GOTCHA by Jarius Bondoc
[Summary] => As he spins an alibi on Jueteng-gate, Joseph Estrada is incriminating his own kin, pals and aides. He portrays himself in continuing radio and press interviews as the unsullied hero, while everyone else around him is tainted one way or another by jueteng payola and criminal negligence. He typecast a movie in his mind: Brother-in-law Raul de Guzman, personal lawyer Edward Serapio, PNP chief Panfilo Lacson they, among many others, are the ones responsible for abetting jueteng, receiving protection money, or at the very least failing to report crime.
[DatePublished] => 2000-11-15 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
ARIEL RABE
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 102090
[Title] => Conditioning minds for slick acquittal - GOTCHA by Jarius Bondoc
[Summary] => Theyll do anything to quash Chavit Singsons testimony in Joseph Estradas impeachment trial. On opening day, defense lawyers accused the whistle-blower of concocting the jueteng bribery story. When his time came to stand as witness, they tried to stop his direct examination by a private lawyer. Simultaneously at the other end of town, Estradas gofers at the House of Representatives assailed the congressmen-prosecutors use of private counsel. When these didnt work, senator-judges themselves took turns cross-examining Singson.
[DatePublished] => 2000-12-16 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 102918
[Title] => Would you go to jail for Erap? - GOTCHA by Jarius Bondoc
[Summary] => As he spins an alibi on Jueteng-gate, Joseph Estrada is incriminating his own kin, pals and aides. He portrays himself in continuing radio and press interviews as the unsullied hero, while everyone else around him is tainted one way or another by jueteng payola and criminal negligence. He typecast a movie in his mind: Brother-in-law Raul de Guzman, personal lawyer Edward Serapio, PNP chief Panfilo Lacson they, among many others, are the ones responsible for abetting jueteng, receiving protection money, or at the very least failing to report crime.
[DatePublished] => 2000-11-15 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
December 16, 2000 - 12:00am
November 15, 2000 - 12:00am