+ Follow ARBITRAL COURT Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 1542031
[Title] => Enhanced cooperation
[Summary] => With the Supreme Court upholding the constitutionality of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement or EDCA between the Philippines and United States, a common question is whether Uncle Sam will now be more inclined to stop Chinese expansionist activities in disputed waters.
[DatePublished] => 2016-01-12 09:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133252
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1807094
[AuthorName] => Ana Marie Pamintuan
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 205443
[Title] => Piatco, lawyers should be cited for contempt Yasay
[Summary] => Former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Perfecto Yasay said yesterday, "PIATCO and its lawyers should be cited for contempt of court three times over for embarrassing and degrading the Supreme Court."
This was prompted by PIATCO counsel FrankA Chavezs remark that the Supreme Court decision declaring as void and illegal at PIATCO deals, as "legalized highway robbery."
[DatePublished] => 2003-05-09 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Business
[SectionUrl] => business
[URL] =>
)
)
)
ARBITRAL COURT
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 1542031
[Title] => Enhanced cooperation
[Summary] => With the Supreme Court upholding the constitutionality of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement or EDCA between the Philippines and United States, a common question is whether Uncle Sam will now be more inclined to stop Chinese expansionist activities in disputed waters.
[DatePublished] => 2016-01-12 09:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133252
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1807094
[AuthorName] => Ana Marie Pamintuan
[SectionName] => Opinion
[SectionUrl] => opinion
[URL] =>
)
[1] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 205443
[Title] => Piatco, lawyers should be cited for contempt Yasay
[Summary] => Former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Perfecto Yasay said yesterday, "PIATCO and its lawyers should be cited for contempt of court three times over for embarrassing and degrading the Supreme Court."
This was prompted by PIATCO counsel FrankA Chavezs remark that the Supreme Court decision declaring as void and illegal at PIATCO deals, as "legalized highway robbery."
[DatePublished] => 2003-05-09 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 133272
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] =>
[AuthorName] =>
[SectionName] => Business
[SectionUrl] => business
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest