Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1343104
                    [Title] => Don Vicente Yap Sotto and the Supreme Court on the Press Freedom Law
                    [Summary] => 
Don Vicente Y. Sotto was required by the Supreme Court on December 7, 1948 to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt for his comments that appeared in the newspapers.

                    [DatePublished] => 2014-07-06 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133848
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1236815
                    [AuthorName] => Clarence Paul Oaminal
                    [SectionName] => Freeman Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

ANGEL PARAZO

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 1343104
                    [Title] => Don Vicente Yap Sotto and the Supreme Court on the Press Freedom Law
                    [Summary] => 
Don Vicente Y. Sotto was required by the Supreme Court on December 7, 1948 to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt for his comments that appeared in the newspapers.

                    [DatePublished] => 2014-07-06 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133848
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1236815
                    [AuthorName] => Clarence Paul Oaminal
                    [SectionName] => Freeman Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Don Vicente Yap Sotto and the Supreme Court on the Press Freedom Law

By Clarence Paul Oaminal | July 6, 2014 - 12:00am

Don Vicente Y. Sotto was required by the Supreme Court on December 7, 1948 to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt for his comments that appeared in the newspapers.

Freeman Opinion