Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 319469
                    [Title] => Gate crasher
                    [Summary] => Even if a person has a legal right but he exercised it in bad faith for the sole purpose of injuring another, he is liable for damages under Article 19 and 21 of the Civil Code. This is a principle that Mando tried to invoke but was not applied in his case.


                    [DatePublished] => 2006-02-01 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

AFTER MANDO

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 319469
                    [Title] => Gate crasher
                    [Summary] => Even if a person has a legal right but he exercised it in bad faith for the sole purpose of injuring another, he is liable for damages under Article 19 and 21 of the Civil Code. This is a principle that Mando tried to invoke but was not applied in his case.


                    [DatePublished] => 2006-02-01 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Gate crasher

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | February 1, 2006 - 12:00am

Even if a person has a legal right but he exercised it in bad faith for the sole purpose of injuring another, he is liable for damages under Article 19 and 21 of the Civil Code. This is a principle that Mando tried...

Opinion